BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573808)

  • 1. Measurement uncertainty.
    Bartley D; Lidén G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 18573808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
    Bartley DL
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty.
    O'Donnell GE; Hibbert DB
    Analyst; 2005 May; 130(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 15852143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Description of a generally applicable model for the evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in clinical chemistry.
    Kristiansen J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Oct; 39(10):920-31. PubMed ID: 11758604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. All your data are always missing: incorporating bias due to measurement error into the potential outcomes framework.
    Edwards JK; Cole SR; Westreich D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 44(4):1452-9. PubMed ID: 25921223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying errors without random sampling.
    Phillips CV; LaPole LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jun; 3():9. PubMed ID: 12892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do Orthopaedic Surgeons Acknowledge Uncertainty?
    Teunis T; Janssen S; Guitton TG; Ring D; Parisien R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 474(6):1360-9. PubMed ID: 26552806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for Expressing the Uncertainty of Measurement Results Containing Uncorrected Bias.
    Phillips SD; Eberhardt KR; Parry B
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1997; 102(5):577-585. PubMed ID: 27805145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy diagrams: a novel way to illustrate uncertainty of estimated GFR.
    Björk J; Grubb A; Sterner G; Bäck SE; Nyman U
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2017 May; 77(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 28276725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The handling of uncertainty in economic evaluations of health care strategies].
    Siani C; Moatti JP
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2003 Apr; 51(2):255-76. PubMed ID: 12876511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting measurement uncertainty and coverage intervals near natural limits.
    Cowen S; Ellison SL
    Analyst; 2006 Jun; 131(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16732358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.
    Jurek AM; Maldonado G; Greenland S; Church TR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jul; 61(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 17568060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study.
    Zheng J; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State estimation bias induced by optimization under uncertainty and error cost asymmetry is likely reflected in perception.
    Shimansky YP
    Biol Cybern; 2011 May; 104(4-5):225-33. PubMed ID: 21523488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the presence of bias error using statistical methods.
    Kwartowitz DM; Galloway RL; Shiavi RG
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jan; 13(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19129017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
    Phillips CV
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of accuracy and uncertainty of ELISA assays for the determination of interleukin-4, interleukin-5, interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
    Borg L; Kristiansen J; Christensen JM; Jepsen KF; Poulsen LK
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 May; 40(5):509-19. PubMed ID: 12113298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.