111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573808)
21. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
Fung KY; Krewski D
J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bias in clinical chemistry.
Theodorsson E; Magnusson B; Leito I
Bioanalysis; 2014; 6(21):2855-75. PubMed ID: 25486232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reduction of noise due to systematic uncertainties in 113mIn SPECT imaging using information theory.
Krishna Kumar PT; Phoha VV; Iyengar SS; Iyengar P
Comput Biol Med; 2009 May; 39(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19389664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
Berçik Inal B; Koldas M; Inal H; Coskun C; Gümüs A; Döventas Y
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1100():223-6. PubMed ID: 17460183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of non-differential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies.
Pierce BL; VanderWeele TJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 23045203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Uncertainty beyond sampling error.
Altman DG; Bland JM
BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7065. PubMed ID: 25424583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.
Hofer E
Health Phys; 2007 Mar; 92(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 17293694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Uniformity test of bias when the reference value contains experimental error.
Song R; Kennedy E; Bartley D
Anal Chem; 2001 Jan; 73(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 11199983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Definition and assessment of sampling and analytical accuracy.
Bartley DL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jul; 45(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 11418085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Measurement errors and linear regression].
Marques-Vidal P; Rakotovao R; Ducimetière P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 8134667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Completeness of ascertainment by cancer registries: putting bounds on the number of missing cases.
Silcocks PB; Robinson D
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15284320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Re-interpreting conventional interval estimates taking into account bias and extra-variation.
Höfler M; Seaman SR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Oct; 6():51. PubMed ID: 17042949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of uncertainty in olfactometry.
Higuchi T
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1409-13. PubMed ID: 19381007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The "Lost NNT" can be used to represent uncertainty surrounding number needed to treat.
Sadatsafavi M; Ganjizadeh S; Hatala R; Marra C; FitzGerald M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 65(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 22652350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in routine clinical chemistry--applications to determination of the substance concentration of calcium and glucose in serum.
Linko S; Ornemark U; Kessel R; Taylor PD
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Apr; 40(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 12059081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals.
Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1389-97. PubMed ID: 15319402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uncertainty component evaluation in conventional microbiological qualitative measurements.
Ka CC
J AOAC Int; 2011; 94(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 21919362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accelerated failure time models with covariates subject to measurement error.
He W; Yi GY; Xiong J
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(26):4817-32. PubMed ID: 17436310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
