These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18573808)

  • 41. Systematic errors in analytical measurement results.
    Hibbert DB
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1158(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 17397855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance of bias-correction methods for exposure measurement error using repeated measurements with and without missing data.
    Batistatou E; McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3467-80. PubMed ID: 22733598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attempts to include uncorrected bias in the measurement uncertainty.
    Synek V
    Talanta; 2005 Feb; 65(4):829-37. PubMed ID: 18969876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factor Indeterminacy as Metrological Uncertainty: Implications for Advancing Psychological Measurement.
    Rigdon EE; Becker JM; Sarstedt M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 30829544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Simulation sample sizes for Monte Carlo partial EVPI calculations.
    Oakley JE; Brennan A; Tappenden P; Chilcott J
    J Health Econ; 2010 May; 29(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 20378190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
    Brenner H; Loomis D
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simultaneous inference and bias analysis for longitudinal data with covariate measurement error and missing responses.
    Yi GY; Liu W; Wu L
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20528858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 2. Evaluation for a found insignificant experimental bias.
    Synek V
    Talanta; 2007 Feb; 71(3):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19071450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. On the power of the test for cluster bias.
    Jak S; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):434-55. PubMed ID: 25776804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry.
    Kallner A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1291-7. PubMed ID: 26812796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dielectric measurement: error analysis and assessment of uncertainty.
    Gabriel C; Peyman A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6033-46. PubMed ID: 17110768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sources and control of error in industrial hygiene measurements.
    Johnson DL; Bell ML
    AAOHN J; 1991 Aug; 39(8):362-8. PubMed ID: 1888391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Control for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models.
    Schwartz J; Coull BA
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):539-53. PubMed ID: 14557110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement accuracy and uncertainty in plant biomechanics.
    Nelson N; Stubbs CJ; Larson R; Cook DD
    J Exp Bot; 2019 Jul; 70(14):3649-3658. PubMed ID: 31301144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.
    de Vet HC; Terluin B; Knol DL; Roorda LD; Mokkink LB; Ostelo RW; Hendriks EJ; Bouter LM; Terwee CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19540720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 1. Evaluation for a given value of the true bias.
    Synek V
    Talanta; 2006 Dec; 70(5):1024-34. PubMed ID: 18970877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The search for truth must go beyond statistics.
    Willett WC
    Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):655-6; discussion 657-8. PubMed ID: 18703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.
    Vansteelandt S; Bekaert M; Claeskens G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 21075803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.