These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18574140)

  • 1. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT--feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction.
    Blanke P; Bulla S; Baumann T; Siepe M; Winterer JT; Euringer W; Schäfer AO; Kotter E; Langer M; Pache G
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 20160003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.
    Baumüller S; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Seifert B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19587311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.
    Stolzmann P; Goetti R; Baumueller S; Plass A; Falk V; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20079993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Lockhart DW; Dubinsky TJ; Warren BH; Caldwell JH
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 18552312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study.
    Neefjes LA; Dharampal AS; Rossi A; Nieman K; Weustink AC; Dijkshoorn ML; Ten Kate GJ; Dedic A; Papadopoulou SL; van Straten M; Cademartiri F; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ; Mollet NR
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):779-86. PubMed ID: 21969666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: a phantom study.
    Horiguchi J; Kiguchi M; Fujioka C; Shen Y; Arie R; Sunasaka K; Ito K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 18212215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Fang Y; Zhu JM; Wu Z; Zhu KS; Zhang JS; Shan H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):945-51. PubMed ID: 22745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.
    Gao W; Zhong YM; Sun AM; Wang Q; Ouyang RZ; Hu LW; Qiu HS; Wang SY; Li JY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 26897005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography.
    Achenbach S; Goroll T; Seltmann M; Pflederer T; Anders K; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Uder M; Lell M; Marwan M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 21492807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system.
    Meyer M; Haubenreisser H; Schoepf UJ; Vliegenthart R; Leidecker C; Allmendinger T; Lehmann R; Sudarski S; Borggrefe M; Schoenberg SO; Henzler T
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):373-82. PubMed ID: 24877984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for CT coronary angiography: initial experience.
    Wang Q; Qin J; He B; Zhou Y; Yang JJ; Hou XL; Yang XB; Chen JH; Chen YD
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Aug; 68(8):792-8. PubMed ID: 23601956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ECG-triggered high-pitch CT for simultaneous assessment of the aorta and coronary arteries.
    Hachulla AL; Ronot M; Noble S; Becker CD; Montet X; Vallée JP
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 27451049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Desbiolles L; Baumueller S; Goetti R; Plass A; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Falk V; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(12):933-8. PubMed ID: 20538669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.
    Pflederer T; Rudofsky L; Ropers D; Bachmann S; Marwan M; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1045-50. PubMed ID: 19304712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.