235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18574167)
1. Avoided deforestation as a greenhouse gas mitigation tool: economic issues.
Sohngen B; Beach RH; Andrasko K
J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(4):1368-75. PubMed ID: 18574167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.
Sonne E
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1439-50. PubMed ID: 16825464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing alternatives for mitigating net greenhouse gas emissions and increasing yields from rice production in China over the next twenty years.
Li C; Salas W; DeAngelo B; Rose S
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1554-65. PubMed ID: 16825476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions associated with fuelwood consumption of the brick making industry in Sudan.
Alam SA; Starr M
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jan; 407(2):847-52. PubMed ID: 18992919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Land use change effects on forest carbon cycling throughout the southern United States.
Woodbury PB; Heath LS; Smith JE
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1348-63. PubMed ID: 16825455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.
Bustamante M; Robledo-Abad C; Harper R; Mbow C; Ravindranat NH; Sperling F; Haberl H; Pinto Ade S; Smith P
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Oct; 20(10):3270-90. PubMed ID: 24700759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef.
Cederberg C; Persson UM; Neovius K; Molander S; Clift R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 21280649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential of reclaimed forest and grassland soils.
Shrestha RK; Lal R; Penrose C
J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 19202013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting terrestrial ecosystems and the climate through a global carbon market.
Bonnie R; Carey M; Petsonk A
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1853-73. PubMed ID: 12460502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
Johnson JM; Franzluebbers AJ; Weyers SL; Reicosky DC
Environ Pollut; 2007 Nov; 150(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 17706849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GHG mitigation in Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector in Thailand.
Pradhan BB; Chaichaloempreecha A; Limmeechokchai B
Carbon Balance Manag; 2019 Apr; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 31016555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian peat extraction, 1990-2000: a life-cycle analysis.
Cleary J; Roulet NT; Moore TR
Ambio; 2005 Aug; 34(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 16201217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?
Smith P; Haberl H; Popp A; Erb KH; Lauk C; Harper R; Tubiello FN; de Siqueira Pinto A; Jafari M; Sohi S; Masera O; Böttcher H; Berndes G; Bustamante M; Ahammad H; Clark H; Dong H; Elsiddig EA; Mbow C; Ravindranath NH; Rice CW; Robledo Abad C; Romanovskaya A; Sperling F; Herrero M; House JI; Rose S
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Aug; 19(8):2285-302. PubMed ID: 23505220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon sequestration potential in reclaimed mine sites in seven east-central states.
Sperow M
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1428-38. PubMed ID: 16825463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.
Graves RA; Haugo RD; Holz A; Nielsen-Pincus M; Jones A; Kellogg B; Macdonald C; Popper K; Schindel M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230424. PubMed ID: 32275725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the greenhouse gas budget of straw returning in China: feasibility of mitigation and countermeasures.
Lu F; Wang XK; Han B; Ouyang ZY; Zheng H
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May; 1195 Suppl 1():E107-30. PubMed ID: 20586765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe.
Bellarby J; Tirado R; Leip A; Weiss F; Lesschen JP; Smith P
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Jan; 19(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 23504717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications.
Miles L; Kapos V
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1454-5. PubMed ID: 18556549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation.
Kindermann G; Obersteiner M; Sohngen B; Sathaye J; Andrasko K; Rametsteiner E; Schlamadinger B; Wunder S; Beach R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(30):10302-7. PubMed ID: 18650377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
