133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18574255)
1. Synergistic tissue counterstaining and image segmentation techniques for accurate, quantitative immunohistochemistry.
Zehntner SP; Chakravarty MM; Bolovan RJ; Chan C; Bedell BJ
J Histochem Cytochem; 2008 Oct; 56(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 18574255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of image compression and scaling on automated scoring of immunohistochemical stainings and segmentation of tumor epithelium.
Konsti J; Lundin M; Linder N; Haglund C; Blomqvist C; Nevanlinna H; Aaltonen K; Nordling S; Lundin J
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():29. PubMed ID: 22436596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Romanowsky-Giemsa as a counterstain for immunohistochemistry: optimizing a traditional reagent.
Stefanović D; Stefanović M; Nikin Z
Biotech Histochem; 2013 Aug; 88(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 23651259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicolor counterstaining for immunohistochemistry -- a modified Movat's pentachrome.
Petrovic A; Abramovic M; Mihailovic D; Gligorijevic J; Zivkovic V; Mojsilovic M; Ilic I
Biotech Histochem; 2011 Dec; 86(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 21091081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast unsupervised nuclear segmentation and classification scheme for automatic allred cancer scoring in immunohistochemical breast tissue images.
Mouelhi A; Rmili H; Ali JB; Sayadi M; Doghri R; Mrad K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 165():37-51. PubMed ID: 30337080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruthenium counterstaining for imaging mass cytometry.
Catena R; Montuenga LM; Bodenmiller B
J Pathol; 2018 Apr; 244(4):479-484. PubMed ID: 29405336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated characterization and counting of Ki-67 protein for breast cancer prognosis: A quantitative immunohistochemistry approach.
Mungle T; Tewary S; Arun I; Basak B; Agarwal S; Ahmed R; Chatterjee S; Maity AK; Chakraborty C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Feb; 139():149-161. PubMed ID: 28187885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital immunohistochemistry platform for the staining variation monitoring based on integration of image and statistical analyses with laboratory information system.
Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Baltrusaityte I; Meskauskas R; Besusparis J; Lesciute-Krilaviciene D; Raudeliunas D; Iqbal Y; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 25565007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinically motivated 2-fold framework for quantifying and classifying immunohistochemically stained specimens.
Hall B; Chen W; Reiss M; Foran DJ
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):287-94. PubMed ID: 18044580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging.
Bauman TM; Ricke EA; Drew SA; Huang W; Ricke WA
J Vis Exp; 2016 Apr; (110):. PubMed ID: 27167094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cresyl Violet Stains Mast Cells Selectively: Its Application to Counterstaining in Immunohistochemistry.
Takahashi N; Tarumi W; Hamada N; Ishizuka B; Itoh MT
Zoolog Sci; 2017 Apr; 34(2):147-150. PubMed ID: 28397604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An automated method for segmentation and quantification of blood vessels in histology images.
Bukenya F; Nerissa C; Serres S; Pardon MC; Bai L
Microvasc Res; 2020 Mar; 128():103928. PubMed ID: 31676310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemical stains using a CMYK color model.
Pham NA; Morrison A; Schwock J; Aviel-Ronen S; Iakovlev V; Tsao MS; Ho J; Hedley DW
Diagn Pathol; 2007 Feb; 2():8. PubMed ID: 17326824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-Quality Immunohistochemical Stains Through Computational Assay Parameter Optimization.
Arar NM; Pati P; Kashyap A; Khartchenko AF; Goksel O; Kaigala GV; Gabrani M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Oct; 66(10):2952-2963. PubMed ID: 30762525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate quantitation of Ki67-positive proliferating hepatocytes in rabbit liver by a multicolor immunohistochemical (IHC) approach analyzed with automated tissue and cell segmentation software.
van der Loos CM; de Boer OJ; Mackaaij C; Hoekstra LT; van Gulik TM; Verheij J
J Histochem Cytochem; 2013 Jan; 61(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22941418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated selection of DAB-labeled tissue for immunohistochemical quantification.
Brey EM; Lalani Z; Johnston C; Wong M; McIntire LV; Duke PJ; Patrick CW
J Histochem Cytochem; 2003 May; 51(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 12704205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualization of sperm by immunohistochemistry: application of alternative counterstains.
Erdogan D; Elmas C; Ilgaz C
Arch Androl; 2005; 51(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16025863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of an automatic quantification method for cancer tissue microarray study.
Sanders TH; Stokes TH; Moffitt RA; Chaudry Q; Parry R; Wang MD
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3665-8. PubMed ID: 19964806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of relative changes of immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy in specified anatomical regions.
Paizs M; Engelhardt JI; Siklós L
J Microsc; 2009 Apr; 234(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 19335461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
