127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18574507)
1. Comparison of New Zealand Cancer Registry data with an independent lung cancer audit.
Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B
N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1276):29-41. PubMed ID: 18574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An audit of colon cancer data on the New Zealand Cancer Registry.
Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2008 Aug; 121(1279):46-56. PubMed ID: 18709047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can cancer centres in New Zealand help the cancer registry generate survival data? A pilot study in prostate cancer.
Evans TK; Lamb DS; Cornes DA; Fraser J; Johnson CA; Hamilton DA
N Z Med J; 2002 May; 115(1154):246-7. PubMed ID: 12117178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and completeness of the New Zealand Cancer Registry for staging of invasive breast cancer.
Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Peni T; Lawrenson R
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25037979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of stages I and II non-small-cell lung cancer in a New Zealand study: divergence from international practice and recommendations.
Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B
Intern Med J; 2008 Oct; 38(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 18298555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.
Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capturing tumour stage in a cancer information database.
Evans WK; Crook J; Read D; Morriss J; Logan DM
Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Dec; 2(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 10470461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung cancer patients in New Zealand initially present to secondary care through the emergency department rather than by referral to a respiratory specialist.
Beatty S; Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B
N Z Med J; 2009 May; 122(1294):33-41. PubMed ID: 19465945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unstaged cancer in a population-based registry: prevalence, predictors and patient prognosis.
Gurney J; Sarfati D; Stanley J; Dennett E; Johnson C; Koea J; Simpson A; Studd R
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 37(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 23548729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controversies in prostate cancer staging implementation at a tertiary cancer center.
Sexton T; Rodrigues G; Brecevic E; Boyce L; Parrack D; Lock M; D'Souza D
Can J Urol; 2006 Dec; 13(6):3327-34. PubMed ID: 17187696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International differences in survival from colon cancer: more effective care versus less complete cancer registration.
Prior P; Woodman CB; Collins S
Br J Surg; 1998 Jan; 85(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 9462395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data from a national lung cancer registry contributes to improve outcome and quality of surgery: Danish results.
Jakobsen E; Palshof T; Osterlind K; Pilegaard H
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):348-52; discussion 352. PubMed ID: 19070503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing cancer registry data to promote rational health system design.
Schrag D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(6):378-9. PubMed ID: 18334703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Data quality of a breast cancer database in Naples, Italy. Do the necessary conditions exist for implementing a disease registry?].
Agozzino E; Attena F; Di Palma MA; Simonetti A; Mastrogiacomo F
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2007; 63(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 18216885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: a pilot audit.
Gray NA; Mahadevan K; Campbell VK; Noble EP; Anstey CM
Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Oct; 18(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 23841726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Auckland regional audit of the nurse-led rheumatic fever secondary prophylaxis programme.
Grayson S; Horsburgh M; Lennon D
N Z Med J; 2006 Oct; 119(1243):U2255. PubMed ID: 17063195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy and completeness of childhood cancer registration in New Zealand.
Dockerty JD; Becroft DM; Lewis ME; Williams SM
Cancer Causes Control; 1997 Nov; 8(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 9427428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Lung cancer without metastases--are all patients with resectable tumor operated?].
Rostad H; Strand TE; Langmark FY; Naalsund A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Apr; 128(8):920-3. PubMed ID: 18431414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
