BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18574811)

  • 1. Competition between two microbial populations in a nonmixed environment: effect of cell random motility.
    Lauffenburger D; Calcagno P B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1983 Sep; 25(9):2103-25. PubMed ID: 18574811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition.
    Kelly FX; Dapsis KJ; Lauffenburger DA
    Microb Ecol; 1988 Sep; 16(2):115-31. PubMed ID: 24201566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the coexistence of competing microbial species in a chemostat under cycling.
    Pavlou S; Kevrekidis IG; Lyberatos G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1990 Feb; 35(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 18592514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Growth rate effects on fundamental transport properties of bacterial populations.
    Mercer JR; Ford RM; Stitz JL; Bradbeer C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1993 Dec; 42(11):1277-86. PubMed ID: 18612955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition and coexistence in flowing habitats with a hydraulic storage zone.
    Grover JP; Hsu SB; Wang FB
    Math Biosci; 2009 Nov; 222(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 19706299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mathematical description of competition between two and three bacterial species under dual substrate limitation in the chemostat: a comparison with experimental data.
    Gottschal JC; Thingstad TF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1982 Jun; 24(6):1403-18. PubMed ID: 18546432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of bacterial chemotaxis by measurement of model parameters using the capillary assay.
    Rivero-Hudec M; Lauffenburger DA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1986 Aug; 28(8):1178-90. PubMed ID: 18555444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impossibility of coexistence of three pure and simple competitors in configurations of three interconnected chemostats.
    Chang SW; Baltzis BC
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1989 Jan; 33(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 18587937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of bacterial random motility and chemotaxis coefficients: I. Stopped-flow diffusion chamber assay.
    Ford RM; Phillips BR; Quinn JA; Lauffenburger DA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1991 Mar; 37(7):647-60. PubMed ID: 18600656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complex dynamics of microbial competition in the gradostat.
    Gaki A; Theodorou A; Vayenas DV; Pavlou S
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Jan; 139(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18809443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition for mixed substrates by microbial populations.
    Yoon H; Klinzing G; Blanch HW
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1977 Aug; 19(8):1193-210. PubMed ID: 884234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting stability of mixed microbial cultures from single species experiments: 1. Phenomenological model.
    Pilyugin SS; Reeves GT; Narang A
    Math Biosci; 2004 Dec; 192(2):85-109. PubMed ID: 15627488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantage of storage in a fluctuating environment.
    Kooi BW; Troost TA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Dec; 70(4):527-41. PubMed ID: 16978675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On a density-dependent model of competition for one resource].
    Lobry C; Rapaport A; Mazenc F
    C R Biol; 2006 Feb; 329(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16439334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spreading speed and linear determinacy for two-species competition models.
    Lewis MA; Li B; Weinberger HF
    J Math Biol; 2002 Sep; 45(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 12373345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cell motility and chemotaxis on microbial population growth.
    Lauffenburger D; Aris R; Keller K
    Biophys J; 1982 Dec; 40(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 7183335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operating parameters' effects on the outcome of pure and simple competition between two populations in configurations of two interconnected chemostats.
    Kung CM; Baltzis BC
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1987 Dec; 30(9):1006-18. PubMed ID: 18581544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The coevolution of two phytoplankton species on a single resource: allelopathy as a pseudo-mixotrophy.
    Roy S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Feb; 75(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 19116158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [On the competition among discrete-structured populations: a matrix model for population dynamics of woodreed and birch growing together].
    Ulanova NG; Belova IN; Logofet DO
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2008; 69(6):441-57. PubMed ID: 19140335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of bacterial random motility and chemotaxis coefficients: II. Application of single-cell-based mathematical model.
    Ford RM; Lauffenburger DA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1991 Mar; 37(7):661-72. PubMed ID: 18600657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.