138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18575167)
1. Damages for pain and suffering in tort law.
Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2008 May; 15(5):669-80. PubMed ID: 18575167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box.
Poser S; Bornstein BH; McGorty EK
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 12647467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Damages in medical litigation in New South Wales.
Luntz H
J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 15754551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing injustice from recent legislation subsidising insurance and restricting civil liability?: Baker-Morrison v NSW [2009] Aust Torts Reports 81-999; Amaca Pty Ltd v Novek [2009] Aust Torts Reports 82-001.
Faunce T; Townsend R; Reardon K
J Law Med; 2010 May; 17(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 20552936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Padova Charter on personal injury and damage under civil-tort law : Medico-legal guidelines on methods of ascertainment and criteria of evaluation.
Ferrara SD; Baccino E; Boscolo-Berto R; Comandè G; Domenici R; Hernandez-Cueto C; Gulmen MK; Mendelson G; Montisci M; Norelli GA; Pinchi V; Ranavaya M; Shokry DA; Sterzik V; Vermylen Y; Vieira DN; Viel G; Zoja R;
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26342285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Current issues in legal cases of compensation for healthcare malpractice].
Heiner T; Barzó T
Orv Hetil; 2014 Sep; 155(38):1510-6. PubMed ID: 25217767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The theory of loss of chance in medical liability applied within Brazilian jurisprudence.
Beraldo Ade M; Pereira PM
Med Law; 2012 Jun; 31(2):265-81. PubMed ID: 22900413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
Sloan FA
N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wisconsin's caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases: where Wisconsin stands (and should stand) on "tort reform".
Kenitz M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 May; (325):9-32. PubMed ID: 17009664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability for medical malpractice--recent New Zealand developments.
Sladden N; Graydon S
Med Law; 2009 Mar; 28(2):301-15. PubMed ID: 19705644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assumption of medical risks and the problem of medical liability in ancient Roman law].
Váradi A
Orv Hetil; 2008 Nov; 149(44):2091-3. PubMed ID: 18952529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tort law - loss of a chance doctrine - Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court accepts loss of a chance in medical malpractice suits. - Matsuyama v. Birnbaum, 890 N.E.2d 819 (Mass. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1247-54. PubMed ID: 19320069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who will pay for the adverse events resulting from smallpox vaccination? Liability and compensation issues.
Strongin RJ; Salinsky E
NHPF Issue Brief; 2003 Mar; (788):1-15. PubMed ID: 12650125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An economic assessment of damage caps in medical malpractice litigation imposed by state laws and the implications for federal policy and law.
Frech HE; Hamm WG; Wazzan CP
Health Matrix Clevel; 2006; 16(2):693-722. PubMed ID: 16948253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intentional torts claims in medical cases.
Cockburn T; Madden B
J Law Med; 2006 Feb; 13(3):311-35. PubMed ID: 16506725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Court Decisions on Medical Malpractice in China After the New Tort Liability Law.
Zhang K; Li Y; Fan F; Liu X; Deng ZH
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 27281443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The modern Australian law of mental harm: parochialism triumphant.
Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 16304754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.
Ferrara SD; Ananian V; Baccino E; Boscolo-Berto R; Domenici R; Hernàndez-Cueto C; Mendelson G; Norelli GA; Ranavaya M; Terranova C; Vieira DN; Viel G; Villanueva E; Zoia R; Sartori G
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Sep; 130(5):1387-99. PubMed ID: 27147416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jurisprudential legerdemain: damages for gratuitous services and attendant care.
Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 15957581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health courts: an alternative to traditional tort law.
Miller LA
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 21540680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
