These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18575303)

  • 1. Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: biocreative therapy type I technique.
    Chung KR; Kim SH; Kook YA; Son JH
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18575303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: biocreative therapy type II technique.
    Chung KR; Kim SH; Kook YA; Choo H
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18575304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.
    Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element study of controlling factors of anterior intrusion and torque during Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device (TSAD) dependent en masse retraction without posterior appliances:
    Mo SS; Noh MK; Kim SH; Chung KR; Nelson G
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):255-262. PubMed ID: 31589469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Hong RK; Heo JM; Ha YK
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):129-41. PubMed ID: 15747828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental midline correction using two component C-orthodontic mini-implant.
    Chung KR; Kim SH; Kook YA; Kang YG; Sinclair PM
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 20545095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application of accelerated osteogenic orthodontics and partially osseointegrated mini-implants for minor tooth movement.
    Kim SH; Kook YA; Jeong DM; Lee W; Chung KR; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 19732678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of initial displacement and stresses in the maxillary dentition following en masse retraction using fixed lingual appliance and micro-implants: A finite element analysis.
    Aghera D; Shyagali TR; Kambalya P
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 31302004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach.
    Giancotti A; Greco M
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 20620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants.
    Park YC; Choi YJ; Choi NC; Lee JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 17418722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molar distalization with a partially integrated mini-implant to correct unilateral Class II malocclusion.
    Chung KR; Kim SH; Chaffee MP; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 21130341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distal movement of maxillary molars using a lever-arm and mini-implant system.
    Lim SM; Hong RK
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):167-75. PubMed ID: 18193963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar intrusion with implants using a bite plane appliance: a case report.
    Kato S; Kato M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19076182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.