These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1857618)

  • 1. Pseudohypacusis.
    Rintelmann WF; Schwan SA; Blakley BW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 1857618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Oriented audiological studies in the hard-of-hearing].
    Kapteyn TS; Feenstra L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Apr; 131(17):698-702. PubMed ID: 3587380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiologic evaluation of hereditary and congenital hearing impairment.
    Josey AF
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1983 Nov; 62(11):594-601. PubMed ID: 6360649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basic hearing tests.
    Dennis JM; Neely JG
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 1857612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hearing function in diabetes mellitus].
    Khasanov SA; Babadzhanova SIu
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1986; (3):83-6. PubMed ID: 3523946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic tools in pseudohypacusis in children.
    Saravanappa N; Mepham GA; Bowdler DA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 69(9):1235-8. PubMed ID: 15919120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing loss in the developmentally handicapped: a comparison of three audiometric procedures.
    Benham-Dunster RA; Dunster JR
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 3842842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Principles of hearing aids].
    Thiede O; Stoll W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 May; 84(5):357-70; quiz 371-4. PubMed ID: 15909248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Significance of ERA for differentiating hearing disorders of different origins].
    Schmidt W; Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    HNO; 1983 Apr; 31(4):109-16. PubMed ID: 6853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1990 Apr; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 1970250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of pseudohypacusis: a prospective, randomized study of the use of otoacoustic emissions.
    Balatsouras DG; Kaberos A; Korres S; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E; Economou C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):518-827. PubMed ID: 14663351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quantitative evaluation of hearing disorders in expert assessment. A recent recommendation for calculating the percentage of hearing loss].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):319-25. PubMed ID: 3062285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnosis of speech and hearing disorders in children with the aid of play tonal audiometry].
    Liakh GS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (5):70-3. PubMed ID: 7414834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrophysiologic studies of hearing: current methods in clinical and occupational audiology. I. Brain stem evoked response audiometry (ABR)].
    Sułkowski W
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(5):347-58. PubMed ID: 3254441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Thresholds of the minimal perceptible differences in coupled sounds and speech intelligibility in hard of hearing schoolchildren].
    Moroz BS; Sachenko SV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (3):35-9. PubMed ID: 7385523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlation of sound, speech and BER (brain stem evoked response) audiometry].
    Novotný Z; Kostálová L
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 Nov; 36(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 3442834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory characteristics of children with autism.
    Tharpe AM; Bess FH; Sladen DP; Schissel H; Couch S; Schery T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):430-41. PubMed ID: 16825892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Choice of criteria for classifying the forms of hearing loss applicable to the aims of hearing aids].
    Bazarov VG; Moroz BS; Tishchenko NI; Gekht IuK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (4):21-6. PubMed ID: 7303367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.