343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18576257)
1. What's in a name?
Benham B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):47-9. PubMed ID: 18576257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Making pragmatism practicable for the institutional review board.
Robertson C
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 18576258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.
Brendel DH; Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 18576248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research with pregnant women and fetuses: update on the ethics and the law.
Hall JK
J Nurs Law; 2000 Nov; 7(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 12848177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pragmatism and virtue ethics in clinical research.
Goldberg D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 18576255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Real pragmatism, kids, and the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA).
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):45-7. PubMed ID: 18576256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Children as research subjects: guinea pigs or therapeutic orphans?
Tauer C
Bioeth Exam; 2003; 7(2):1-2, 4-5. PubMed ID: 15025108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Minority report.
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):34-5. PubMed ID: 18576250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards a reasons-based pragmatic ethical framework.
Viens AM
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 18576254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human research protections: time for regulatory reform?
Maschke KJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 18457223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pragmatism, principles, and protection.
Hester DM; Brown J; Schonfeld T
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):32-4. PubMed ID: 18576249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.
Menikoff J
N Engl J Med; 2010 Oct; 363(17):1591-3. PubMed ID: 20942660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reversing "research exceptionalism".
Hansson SO
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):66-7. PubMed ID: 20694917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Extend the reach of institutional review boards first, then strengthen their depth.
Spike J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 19061097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
