BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18577592)

  • 1. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.
    Baugh AT; Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8985-8. PubMed ID: 18577592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
    Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.
    Burmeister SS
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 29048536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.
    Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Dec; 191(12):1173-83. PubMed ID: 16088388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
    Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird.
    Caves EM; Green PA; Zipple MN; Peters S; Johnsen S; Nowicki S
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7718):365-367. PubMed ID: 30069042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).
    Baugh AT; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 20175598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions of multisensory components perceptually rescue túngara frog mating signals.
    Taylor RC; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2013 Jul; 341(6143):273-4. PubMed ID: 23744778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.
    Halfwerk W; Jones PL; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6169):413-6. PubMed ID: 24458640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.
    Hoke KL; Burmeister SS; Fernald RD; Rand AS; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
    J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 24(50):11264-72. PubMed ID: 15601932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arginine vasotocin affects vocal behavior but not selective responses to conspecific calls in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Goutte S; Ryan MJ
    Horm Behav; 2021 Feb; 128():104891. PubMed ID: 33197465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
    Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SEXUAL SELECTION. Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs.
    Lea AM; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):964-6. PubMed ID: 26315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.