BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18578891)

  • 21. Hotelling's T2 multivariate profiling for detecting differential expression in microarrays.
    Lu Y; Liu PY; Xiao P; Deng HW
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3105-13. PubMed ID: 15905280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A learned comparative expression measure for affymetrix genechip DNA microarrays.
    Sheffler W; Upfal E; Sedivy J; Noble WS
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2005; ():144-54. PubMed ID: 16447972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data.
    Breitling R; Herzyk P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 3(5):1171-89. PubMed ID: 16278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust identification of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data.
    Shahjaman M; Manir Hossain Mollah M; Rezanur Rahman M; Islam SMS; Nurul Haque Mollah M
    Genomics; 2020 Mar; 112(2):2000-2010. PubMed ID: 31756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective analysis: reproducibility of interblastomere differences of mRNA expression in 2-cell stage mouse embryos is remarkably poor due to combinatorial mechanisms of blastomere diversification.
    Casser E; Israel S; Schlatt S; Nordhoff V; Boiani M
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 24(7):388-400. PubMed ID: 29746690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Support vector machine quantile regression for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray analysis.
    Sohn I; Kim S; Hwang C; Lee JW; Shim J
    Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 18852921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data.
    Boareto M; Caticha N
    Microarrays (Basel); 2014 Dec; 3(4):340-51. PubMed ID: 27600352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Very Important Pool (VIP) genes--an application for microarray-based molecular signatures.
    Su Z; Hong H; Fang H; Shi L; Perkins R; Tong W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S9. PubMed ID: 18793473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simulation to analyze feature selection methods utilizing gene ontology for gene expression classification.
    Gillies CE; Siadat MR; Patel NV; Wilson GD
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Dec; 46(6):1044-59. PubMed ID: 23892294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
    Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. R-Ensembler: A greedy rough set based ensemble attribute selection algorithm with kNN imputation for classification of medical data.
    Bania RK; Halder A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Feb; 184():105122. PubMed ID: 31622857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of a Four-Gene Signature With Prognostic Significance in Endometrial Cancer Using Weighted-Gene Correlation Network Analysis.
    Huang S; Pang L; Wei C
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():678780. PubMed ID: 34616422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Framework for Parallel Preprocessing of Microarray Data Using Hadoop.
    Sahlabadi A; Chandren Muniyandi R; Sahlabadi M; Golshanbafghy H
    Adv Bioinformatics; 2018; 2018():9391635. PubMed ID: 29796018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of statistical tests for detecting differential expression using Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Vardhanabhuti S; Blakemore SJ; Clark SM; Ghosh S; Stephens RJ; Rajagopalan D
    OMICS; 2006; 10(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 17233564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of High-Level Microarray Analysis Methods in the Context of Result Consistency.
    Chrominski K; Tkacz M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128845. PubMed ID: 26057385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification of gene signatures from RNA-seq data using Pareto-optimal cluster algorithm.
    Mallik S; Zhao Z
    BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Dec; 12(Suppl 8):126. PubMed ID: 30577846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Overexpression of CD80 and ISG15 Are Associated with the Progression and Metastasis of Breast Cancer by a Meta-Analysis Integrating Three Microarray Datasets.
    Li Y; Bai W; Zhang L
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2020 Jan; 26(1):443-452. PubMed ID: 30411299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fisher's combined p-value for detecting differentially expressed genes using Affymetrix expression arrays.
    Hess A; Iyer H
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():96. PubMed ID: 17419876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.