These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18579911)

  • 1. Estimating segment inertial parameters using fan-beam DXA.
    Wicke J; Dumas GA
    J Appl Biomech; 2008 May; 24(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 18579911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The measurement of body segment inertial parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Durkin JL; Dowling JJ; Andrews DM
    J Biomech; 2002 Dec; 35(12):1575-80. PubMed ID: 12445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.
    Norcross J; Van Loan MD
    Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change.
    Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
    Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pencil-beam versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: appendicular lean soft tissue.
    Ioannidou E; Padilla J; Wang J; Heymsfield SB; Thornton JC; Horlick M; Gallagher D; Pierson RN
    Acta Diabetol; 2003 Oct; 40 Suppl 1():S83-5. PubMed ID: 14618441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between a new model and current models for estimating trunk segment inertial parameters.
    Wicke J; Dumas GA; Costigan PA
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19041973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
    Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new geometric-based model to accurately estimate arm and leg inertial estimates.
    Wicke J; Dumas GA
    J Biomech; 2014 Jun; 47(8):1869-75. PubMed ID: 24735506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing body composition and changes in body composition. Another look at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Lohman TG; Harris M; Teixeira PJ; Weiss L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():45-54. PubMed ID: 10865709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Validated Geometric Model for the Calculation of Body Segment Inertial Parameters of Young Females.
    Winter SL; Forrest SM; Wallace J; Challis JH
    J Appl Biomech; 2018 Apr; 34(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 28787232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anthropometric parameters in children: a comparison of values obtained from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and cadaver-based estimates.
    Ganley KJ; Powers CM
    Gait Posture; 2004 Apr; 19(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 15013501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body Segment Inertial Parameters of elite swimmers Using DXA and indirect Methods.
    Rossi M; Lyttle A; El-Sallam A; Benjanuvatra N; Blanksby B
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(4):761-75. PubMed ID: 24421737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of body segment models for female high jumpers utilising DXA images.
    Mikko V; Juha I
    J Biomech; 2022 Aug; 141():111230. PubMed ID: 35914324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DXA: Technical aspects and application.
    Bazzocchi A; Ponti F; Albisinni U; Battista G; Guglielmi G
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1481-92. PubMed ID: 27157852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Kastl S; Sommer T; Klein P; Hohenberger W; Engelke K
    Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 11792592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.