These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18580097)

  • 21. The effectiveness of inking needle core prostate biopsies for preventing patient specimen identification errors: a technique to address Joint Commission patient safety goals in specialty laboratories.
    Raff LJ; Engel G; Beck KR; O'Brien AS; Bauer ME
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Feb; 133(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 19195973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].
    Minato H; Fukushima M; Nojima T; Nakano M
    Rinsho Byori; 2013 Aug; 61(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 24218776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Practical Approach to Investigating Cross-Contaminants in the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory.
    Hodgson AJ; Shang YM; Boulianne P; Downes MR; Hwang D; Slodkowska E
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 Oct; 28(7):700-710. PubMed ID: 32188330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
    Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of latent factors contributing to error: addressing surgical pathology error wisely.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22032570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Henry Ford Production System: measures of process defects and waste in surgical pathology as a basis for quality improvement initiatives.
    D'Angelo R; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Sep; 128(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 17709316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety.
    Sciacovelli L; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 19328194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors.
    Da Rin G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
    Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpretative reports and critical values.
    Piva E; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19306860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient misidentification in oncology care.
    Schulmeister L
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Jun; 12(3):495-8. PubMed ID: 18515248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of Informatics in Patient Safety and Quality Assurance.
    Nakhleh RE
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Jun; 8(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 26065802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
    Dimenstein IB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 132(6):975-6; author reply 976-7. PubMed ID: 19926589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rate of occult specimen provenance complications in routine clinical practice.
    Pfeifer JD; Liu J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 139(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developing and pilot testing practical measures of preanalytic surgical specimen identification defects.
    Bixenstine PJ; Zarbo RJ; Holzmueller CG; Yenokyan G; Robinson R; Hudson DW; Prescott AM; Hubble R; Murphy MM; George CT; D'Angelo R; Watson SR; Lubomski LH; Berenholtz SM
    Am J Med Qual; 2013; 28(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 23322909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors.
    Chiozza ML; Ponzetti C
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 19298799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient identification: hybrids and doppelgängers.
    Cummins D
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2007 Mar; 44(Pt 2):106-10. PubMed ID: 17362576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.