224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18581504)
1. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Wong LS; Yong BH; Young KK; Lau LS; Cheng KL; Man JS; Irwin MG
Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 18581504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Su BC; Yu HP; Yang MW; Lin CC; Kao MC; Chang CH; Lee WC
Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 18581505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides accurate measurement of cardiac output in recipients after liver transplantation.
Su BC; Lin CC; Su CW; Hui YL; Tsai YF; Yang MW; Lui PW
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Dec; 46(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19097964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.
Beltramo F; Menteer J; Razavi A; Khemani RG; Szmuszkovicz J; Newth CJ; Ross PA
Pediatr Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 26364291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.
Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement.
Knirsch W; Kretschmar O; Tomaske M; Stutz K; Nagdyman N; Balmer C; Schmitz A; Béttex D; Berger F; Bauersfeld U; Weiss M
Intensive Care Med; 2008 Jun; 34(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 18297271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation.
Krejci V; Vannucci A; Abbas A; Chapman W; Kangrga IM
Liver Transpl; 2010 Jun; 16(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 20517912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter.
Thom O; Taylor DM; Wolfe RE; Cade J; Myles P; Krum H; Wolfe R
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Dec; 103(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 19864307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus transpulmonary thermodilution during liver transplantation: interchangeable methods?
Vilchez Monge AL; Tranche Alvarez-Cagigas I; Perez-Peña J; Olmedilla L; Jimeno C; Sanz J; Bellón Cano JM; Garutti I
Minerva Anestesiol; 2014 Nov; 80(11):1178-87. PubMed ID: 24569356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. USCOM (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitors) lacks agreement with thermodilution cardiac output and transoesophageal echocardiography valve measurements.
Van den Oever HL; Murphy EJ; Christie-Taylor GA
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Dec; 35(6):903-10. PubMed ID: 18084981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ultrasound cardiac output monitor and thermodilution for cardiac function monitoring in critical patients: a Meta-analysis].
Zhang Y; Wang Y; Ji D; Qian J; Xu J; Shi J
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1462-1468. PubMed ID: 32029030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients.
Ball TR; Tricinella AP; Kimbrough BA; Luna S; Gloyna DF; Villamaria FJ; Culp WC
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1128-32. PubMed ID: 23992653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study.
Chan JS; Segara D; Nair P
Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 17227267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
