These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18581818)

  • 1. A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2008 Jun; 11(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18581818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis.
    Zhang J; Fu H; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2695-707. PubMed ID: 25851533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis.
    Gumedze FN; Jackson D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():19. PubMed ID: 21324180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical approaches for conducting network meta-analysis in drug development.
    Jones B; Roger J; Lane PW; Lawton A; Fletcher C; Cappelleri JC; Tate H; Moneuse P;
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 22213533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 7746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The orchard plot: Cultivating a forest plot for use in ecology, evolution, and beyond.
    Nakagawa S; Lagisz M; O'Dea RE; Rutkowska J; Yang Y; Noble DWA; Senior AM
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 32445243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
    Hansen JB; Juhl CB; Boutron I; Tugwell P; Ghogomu EAT; Pardo Pardo J; Rader T; Wells GA; Mayhew A; Maxwell L; Lund H; Christensen R;
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e005491. PubMed ID: 25280805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Gregory W; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 22342263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
    Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models.
    Villar J; Mackey ME; Carroli G; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(23):3635-47. PubMed ID: 11746343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis in hematology and oncology.
    Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; Lau J
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2000 Aug; 14(4):973-91. PubMed ID: 10949784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Label-invariant models for the analysis of meta-epidemiological data.
    Rhodes KM; Mawdsley D; Turner RM; Jones HE; Savović J; Higgins JPT
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Yang M; Goldstein H; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3417-32. PubMed ID: 11122505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity analysis with iterative outlier detection for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Meng Z; Wang J; Lin L; Wu C
    Stat Med; 2024 Apr; 43(8):1549-1563. PubMed ID: 38318993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.
    Nagashima K; Noma H; Furukawa TA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1689-1702. PubMed ID: 29745296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.