339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18582233)
1. Lymphocyte proliferation testing in chromium allergic contact dermatitis.
Martins LE; Duarte AJ; Aoki V; Nunes RS; Ogusuku S; Reis VM
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2008 Jul; 33(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 18582233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch test reactivity to a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel in metal-allergic patients in correlation to the metal ion release.
Summer B; Fink U; Zeller R; Rueff F; Maier S; Roider G; Thomas P
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 17577355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of effector and regulatory immune reactivity to nickel.
Rustemeyer T; von Blomberg BM; van Hoogstraten IM; Bruynzeel DP; Scheper RJ
Clin Exp Allergy; 2004 Sep; 34(9):1458-66. PubMed ID: 15347381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of nickel and palladium contact hypersensitivity by a flow cytometric lymphocyte proliferation test.
Spoerri I; Scherer K; Michel S; Link S; Bircher AJ; Heijnen IA
Allergy; 2015 Mar; 70(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 25443647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Epicutaneous testing (patch testing)].
Holm JO; Thune P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(11):1361-2. PubMed ID: 8337626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of chromium allergy by cellular in vitro methods.
Lindemann M; Rietschel F; Zabel M; Grosse-Wilde H
Clin Exp Allergy; 2008 Sep; 38(9):1468-75. PubMed ID: 18384428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epicutaneous patch testing.
Devos SA; Van Der Valk PG
Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 12370148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cobalt-containing alloys and their ability to release cobalt and cause dermatitis.
Julander A; Hindsén M; Skare L; Lidén C
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 19260915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
Keir J; English J; Fergie N
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory T helper cells identify patients with nickel, cobalt, and chromium metal allergy.
Blom LH; Elrefaii SA; Zachariae C; Thyssen JP; Poulsen LK; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 33576045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromated metal products may be hazardous to patients with chromate allergy.
Geier J; Lessmann H; Hellweg B; Jappe U; Spornraft-Ragaller P; Fuchs T; Aberer W; Frosch PJ; Weisshaar E; Mahler V; Löffler H; Skudlik C; Szliska C; Koch P; Pföhler C; Lilie M; Becker D; Trcka J; Meyer J; Hahn JU; Adam M
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 19338587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2[PdCl4]) as an improved test salt for palladium allergy patch testing.
Muris J; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18154558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of chromium-allergic dermatitis patients prior to regulatory intervention for chromium in leather: a questionnaire study.
Bregnbak D; Thyssen JP; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Dec; 71(6):338-47. PubMed ID: 25142070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: modified in vitro test protocols for better detection of allergen-specific response.
Spiewak R; Moed H; von Blomberg BM; Bruynzeel DP; Scheper RJ; Gibbs S; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 17244072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphocyte transformation test in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.
Basketter D; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 15982223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
