534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18585222)
21. Comparison of dynamic mobilization of Co, Cd and Pb in sediments using DGT and metal mobility assessed by sequential extraction.
Roulier JL; Belaud S; Coquery M
Chemosphere; 2010 May; 79(8):839-43. PubMed ID: 20304462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mobility of arsenic, cadmium and zinc in a multi-element contaminated soil profile assessed by in-situ soil pore water sampling, column leaching and sequential extraction.
Beesley L; Moreno-Jiménez E; Clemente R; Lepp N; Dickinson N
Environ Pollut; 2010 Jan; 158(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 19683374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phytostabilization of a metal contaminated sandy soil. II: Influence of compost and/or inorganic metal immobilizing soil amendments on metal leaching.
Ruttens A; Colpaert JV; Mench M; Boisson J; Carleer R; Vangronsveld J
Environ Pollut; 2006 Nov; 144(2):533-9. PubMed ID: 16530308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential anthropogenic mobilisation of mercury and arsenic from soils on mineralised rocks, Northland, New Zealand.
Craw D
J Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 74(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 15644268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of incubation on solubility and mobility of trace metals in two contaminated soils.
Ma LQ; Dong Y
Environ Pollut; 2004 Aug; 130(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 15182963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of leaching characteristics of heavy metals in APC residue from an MSW incinerator using various extraction methods.
Chiang KY; Tsai CC; Wang KS
Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 18571915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Leachability of heavy metals and arsenic from slags of metal extraction industry at Angleur (eastern Belgium).
Ganne P; Cappuyns V; Vervoort A; Buvé L; Swennen R
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Mar; 356(1-3):69-85. PubMed ID: 15913709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The problem of arsenic interference in the analysis of Cd to evaluate its extractability in soils contaminated by arsenic.
Waterlot C; Douay F
Talanta; 2009 Dec; 80(2):716-22. PubMed ID: 19836542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of metal spiking on different chemical pools and chemically extractable fractions of heavy metals in sewage sludge.
Kandpal G; Ram B; Srivastava PC; Singh SK
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jan; 106(2-3):133-7. PubMed ID: 15177102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal of multiple-metals from contaminated clay minerals.
Li LY
Environ Technol; 2006 Jul; 27(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 16894825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transversal immission patterns and leachability of heavy metals in road side soils.
Hjortenkrans DS; Bergbäck BG; Häggerud AV
J Environ Monit; 2008 Jun; 10(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 18528541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of the solubility of zinc, copper, nickel, cadmium, and lead in metal-contaminated soils.
Zan NR; Datta SP; Rattan RK; Dwivedi BS; Meena MC
Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Dec; 185(12):10015-25. PubMed ID: 23880914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Leaching of heavy metals from chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood after disposal.
Moghaddam AH; Mulligan CN
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):628-37. PubMed ID: 17499985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determining metal origins and availability in fluvial deposits by analysis of geochemical baselines and solid-solution partitioning measurements and modelling.
Vijver MG; Spijker J; Vink JP; Posthuma L
Environ Pollut; 2008 Dec; 156(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 18617300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the potential of indigenous calcareous shale for neutralization and removal of arsenic and heavy metals from acid mine drainage in the Taxco mining area, Mexico.
Romero FM; Núñez L; Gutiérrez ME; Armienta MA; Ceniceros-Gómez AE
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 60(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 20523977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enrichment of marsh soils with heavy metals by effect of anthropic pollution.
Vega FA; Covelo EF; Cerqueira B; Andrade ML
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(2-3):1056-63. PubMed ID: 19525065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of ripening on pHstat leaching behaviour of heavy metals from dredged sediments.
Cappuyns V; Swennen R; Devivier A
J Environ Monit; 2004 Sep; 6(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 15346182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sorption kinetics and leachability of heavy metal from the contaminated soil amended with immobilizing agent (humus soil and hydroxyapatite).
Chaturvedi PK; Seth CS; Misra V
Chemosphere; 2006 Aug; 64(7):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16423377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multi-step leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soils with EDTA.
Finzgar N; Lestan D
Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(5):824-32. PubMed ID: 16879858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of short-term leach tests for heavy metal release from mineral processing waste.
Al-Abed SR; Hageman PL; Jegadeesan G; Madhavan N; Allen D
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 364(1-3):14-23. PubMed ID: 16336991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
