193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18586064)
1. On the skin sensitisation potential of rosin and oxidised rosin.
Botham PA; Lees D; Illing HP; Malmfors T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 18586064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin sensitization and possible groupings for 'read across' for rosin based substances.
Illing HP; Malmfors T; Rodenburg L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 19409440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact allergy to colophony. Chemical identifications of allergens, sensitization experiments and clinical experiences.
Karlberg AT
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1988; 139():1-43. PubMed ID: 3188806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergy to acid and neutral fractions of rosins. Sensitization experiments in guinea pigs and patch testing in patients.
Karlberg AT; Boman A; Holmbom B; Lidén C
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(2):31-6. PubMed ID: 3698833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local lymph node assay (LLNA): comparison of different protocols by testing skin-sensitizing epoxy resin system components.
Gamer AO; Nies E; Vohr HW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 18824053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Allergenic components in modified and unmodified rosin. Chemical characterization and studies of allergenic activity.
Gäfvert E
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1994; 184():1-36. PubMed ID: 9868506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oxidation of resin acids in colophony (rosin) and its implications for patch testing.
Sadhra S; Foulds IS; Gray CN
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Aug; 39(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 9746183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experiences with Freund's complete adjuvant test (FCAT) when screening for contact allergens in colophony.
Boman A; Karlberg AT; Wahlberg JE
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 3349775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT).
Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays.
Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 30(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20583317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydrogenation reduces the allergenicity of colophony (rosin).
Karlberg AT; Boman A; Nilsson JL
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jul; 19(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 3180766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experience and patch testing using colophony (rosin) from different sources.
Karlberg AT; Lidén C
Br J Dermatol; 1985 Oct; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 4063182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of a weight of evidence approach to assessing discordant sensitisation datasets: implications for REACH.
Basketter D; Ball N; Cagen S; Carrillo JC; Certa H; Eigler D; Garcia C; Esch H; Graham C; Haux C; Kreiling R; Mehling A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 19523501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolated colophony allergens as screening substances for contact allergy.
Karlberg AT; Gäfvert E
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Oct; 35(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 8957638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contact allergy to dehydroabietic acid derivatives isolated from Portuguese colophony.
Karlberg AT; Boman A; Hacksell U; Jacobsson S; Nilsson JL
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Sep; 19(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 3191677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
