322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18587501)
1. Bias in research.
Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research.
Mark DH
Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.
Lu CY
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 May; 63(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 19392919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide.
Winegardner ML; Reaume KT; Dabaja GS; Kalus JS
Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jan; 27(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17192168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
Westhoff CL
Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research.
Walji R; Boon H
Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2006 May; 12(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 16648085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias in surgical research.
Paradis C
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving participant selection in disease management programmes: insights gained from propensity score stratification.
Linden A; Adams JL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):914-8. PubMed ID: 19018926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations.
Glanz JM; McClure DL; Xu S; Hambidge SJ; Lee M; Kolczak MS; Kleinman K; Mullooly JP; France EK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):808-18. PubMed ID: 16828674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological issues and complementary therapies: researching intangibles?
Carter B
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 2003 Aug; 9(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12852929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
