These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1858865)

  • 21. Fat-free mass index and fat mass index percentiles in Caucasians aged 18-98 y.
    Schutz Y; Kyle UU; Pichard C
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2002 Jul; 26(7):953-60. PubMed ID: 12080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The use of bioimpedance analysis for the assessment of relative body fat in obese women].
    Vsetulová E; Bunc V
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2004; 143(8):528-32. PubMed ID: 15446457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations.
    Deurenberg P; Andreoli A; Borg P; Kukkonen-Harjula K; de Lorenzo A; van Marken Lichtenbelt WD; Testolin G; Vigano R; Vollaard N
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2001 Nov; 55(11):973-9. PubMed ID: 11641746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of body fat mass using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectric impedance analysis, and anthropometry in HIV-positive male subjects receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.
    Aghdassi E; Arendt B; Salit IE; Allard JP
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2007; 31(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 17308254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting fat-free mass in children using bioimpedance analysis.
    Pietrobelli A; Andreoli A; Cervelli V; Carbonelli MG; Peroni DG; De Lorenzo A
    Acta Diabetol; 2003 Oct; 40 Suppl 1():S212-5. PubMed ID: 14618476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Body fat measurement in adolescents: comparison of skinfold thickness equations with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rodríguez G; Moreno LA; Blay MG; Blay VA; Fleta J; Sarría A; Bueno M;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Oct; 59(10):1158-66. PubMed ID: 16047030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bioimpedance prediction of fat-free mass from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a multi-ethnic group of 2-year-old children.
    Rush EC; Bristow S; Plank LD; Rowan J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Feb; 67(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 23232588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bioelectrical impedance vs air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine body composition in patients with end-stage renal disease.
    Flakoll PJ; Kent P; Neyra R; Levenhagen D; Chen KY; Ikizler TA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 14763788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders.
    Tothill P; James Hannan W
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2004 Jul; 28(7):912-9. PubMed ID: 15098016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of body composition in ballett dancers: correlation among anthropometric measurements, bio-electrical impedance analysis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Eliakim A; Ish-Shalom S; Giladi A; Falk B; Constantini N
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Nov; 21(8):598-601. PubMed ID: 11156282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationships between plasma leptin levels and body composition parameters measured by different methods in postmenopausal women.
    Jürimäe T; Sudi K; Jürimäe J; Payerl D; Rüütel K
    Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 12953174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Body composition in prepubertal girls: comparison of six methods.
    Treuth MS; Butte NF; Wong WW; Ellis KJ
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1352-9. PubMed ID: 11571599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Body size, subcutaneous fatness and total body fat in older adults.
    Chumlea WC; Roche AF; Webb P
    Int J Obes; 1984; 8(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 6511167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Time-dependent variation in weight and body composition in healthy adults.
    Rosenbaum K; Wang J; Pierson RN; Kotler DP
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2000; 24(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10772182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of body fat in a dolescents: comparison of two electric bioimpedance devices with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    de Faria ER; de Faria FR; Gonçalves VS; Franceschini Sdo C; Peluzio Mdo C; Sant'Ana LF; Priore SE
    Nutr Hosp; 2014 Dec; 30(6):1270-8. PubMed ID: 25433108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is 3-compartment bioimpedance spectroscopy useful to assess body composition in renal transplant patients?
    Pellé G; Branche I; Kossari N; Tricot L; Delahousse M; Dreyfus JF
    J Ren Nutr; 2013 Sep; 23(5):363-6. PubMed ID: 23623395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A SIMPLE DECOMPRESSION METHOD FOR IN VIVO BODY FAT ESTIMATION IN SMALL ANIMALS.
    KODAMA AM; PACE N
    J Appl Physiol; 1963 Nov; 18():1272-6. PubMed ID: 14080759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determination of total body fat by absorption of an inert gas; measurements and results in normal human subjects.
    LESSER GT; PERL W; STEELE JM
    J Clin Invest; 1960 Dec; 39(12):1791-806. PubMed ID: 13761186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of anthropometric measures for assessment of cardiometabolic risk in early childhood.
    Coles N; Retnakaran R; Hanley A; Birken C; Hamilton J
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Aug; 23(12):2100-2108. PubMed ID: 32301411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.