These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18588715)

  • 1. Rigid thinking about deformables: do children sometimes overgeneralize the shape bias?
    Samuelson LK; Horst JS; Schutte AR; Dobbertin BN
    J Child Lang; 2008 Aug; 35(3):559-89. PubMed ID: 18588715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's attention to rigid and deformable shape in naming and non-naming tasks.
    Samuelson LK; Smith LB
    Child Dev; 2000; 71(6):1555-70. PubMed ID: 11194256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits and costs of comparisons in a novel object categorization task: interactions with development.
    Augier L; Thibaut JP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 23606202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects.
    Abecassis M; Sera MD; Yonas A; Schwade J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Mar; 78(3):213-39. PubMed ID: 11222000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How we categorize objects is related to how we remember them: The shape bias as a memory bias.
    Vlach HA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():12-30. PubMed ID: 27454236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual complexity and form class cues in novel word extension tasks: how 4-year-old children interpret adjectives and count nouns.
    Sandhofer CM; Smith LB
    Dev Sci; 2004 Jun; 7(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 15595376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
    van der Zee E; Zulch H; Mills D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49382. PubMed ID: 23185321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning.
    Colunga E; Smith LB
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Apr; 112(2):347-82. PubMed ID: 15783290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning.
    Cimpian A; Markman EM
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Nov; 41(6):1003-19. PubMed ID: 16351346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toddlers can adaptively change how they categorize: same objects, same session, two different categorical distinctions.
    Horst JS; Ellis AE; Samuelson LK; Trejo E; Worzalla SL; Peltan JR; Oakes LM
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19120417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamic nature of knowledge: insights from a dynamic field model of children's novel noun generalization.
    Samuelson LK; Schutte AR; Horst JS
    Cognition; 2009 Mar; 110(3):322-45. PubMed ID: 19131050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Set size, individuation, and attention to shape.
    Cantrell L; Smith LB
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 23167969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children's categorization and generalization.
    Vlach HA; Sandhofer CM; Bjork RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jul; 123():129-37. PubMed ID: 24613074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization.
    Graham SA; Namy LL; Gentner D; Meagher K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 20643266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds.
    Samuelson LK
    Dev Psychol; 2002 Nov; 38(6):1016-37. PubMed ID: 12428712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confronting complexity: insights from the details of behavior over multiple timescales.
    Samuelson LK; Horst JS
    Dev Sci; 2008 Mar; 11(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18333976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infants' reliance on shape to generalize novel labels to animate and inanimate objects.
    Graham SA; Poulin-Dubois D
    J Child Lang; 1999 Jun; 26(2):295-320. PubMed ID: 11706467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distribution of the feature [+animate] in the lexicon of the child.
    Holland VM; Rohrman NL
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1979 Jul; 8(4):367-78. PubMed ID: 490443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?
    Samuelson LK; Smith LB
    Cognition; 1999 Nov; 73(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10536222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How specific is the shape bias?
    Diesendruck G; Bloom P
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 12625443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.