BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18588960)

  • 21. The Viracept (nelfinavir)--ethyl methanesulfonate case: a threshold risk assessment for human exposure to a genotoxic drug contamination?
    Lutz WK
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 19695319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Toxicity due to excess and deficiency.
    Aggett PJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 20077288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Considerations regarding a permitted daily exposure calculation for ethyl methanesulfonate.
    Müller L; Gocke E
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):330-2. PubMed ID: 19857798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.
    Dolan DG; Naumann BD; Sargent EV; Maier A; Dourson M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16099564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early indicators of response in biologically based risk assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens.
    Gastel JA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Jun; 33(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11407940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety assessment of boron by application of new uncertainty factors and their subdivision.
    Hasegawa R; Hirata-Koizumi M; Dourson ML; Parker A; Ono A; Hirose A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Feb; 65(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23137930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety factors and establishment of acceptable daily intakes.
    Renwick AG
    Food Addit Contam; 1991; 8(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 1868926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [On nitrates standardisation in human daily food intake].
    Maĭrapetian AKh; Barsel'iants GB
    Vopr Pitan; 2003; 72(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 12664694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Study on hepatoxicity and nephrotoxicity of cinnabar in rats].
    Liang A; Wang J; Xue B; Li C; Liu T; Zhao Y; Cao C; Yi Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 34(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 19445157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toxicological analysis points to a lower tolerable daily intake of melamine in food.
    Hsieh DP; Chiang CF; Chiang PH; Wen CP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 19486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose response considerations in risk assessment--an overview of recent ILSI activities.
    Holsapple MP; Wallace KB
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 18588961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The no-observed-adverse-effect-level in drug safety evaluations: use, issues, and definition(s).
    Dorato MA; Engelhardt JA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Aug; 42(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15979222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk management and risk assessment of novel plant foods: concepts and principles.
    Knudsen I; Søborg I; Eriksen F; Pilegaard K; Pedersen J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46(5):1681-705. PubMed ID: 18295954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of acute oral toxicity using the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) from the 28 day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats.
    Bulgheroni A; Kinsner-Ovaskainen A; Hoffmann S; Hartung T; Prieto P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 18977273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Threshold dose for peanut: risk characterization based upon published results from challenges of peanut-allergic individuals.
    Taylor SL; Crevel RW; Sheffield D; Kabourek J; Baumert J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 47(6):1198-204. PubMed ID: 19232533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Safety assessment of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a food ingredient.
    Burdock GA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2341-51. PubMed ID: 17723258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Current Dietary Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food Underestimates the Actual Risk.
    Zarn JA; Geiser HC
    Chimia (Aarau); 2019 Oct; 73(10):832-834. PubMed ID: 31645245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hazard characterisation of chemicals in food and diet. dose response, mechanisms and extrapolation issues.
    Dybing E; Doe J; Groten J; Kleiner J; O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Schlatter J; Steinberg P; Tritscher A; Walker R; Younes M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):237-82. PubMed ID: 11893399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Literature review on the genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity of ethyl methanesulfonate.
    Gocke E; Bürgin H; Müller L; Pfister T
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 19857796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.