These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589061)

  • 1. Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?
    Martin MR; Lindquist T; Kotchen TA
    Am J Med; 2008 Jul; 121(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 18589061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Miller Sostek A; Hoffmann R; Malik K; Stanfield B
    J Investig Med; 2006 Jan; 54(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16409886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demystifying the NIH grant application process.
    Berg KM; Gill TM; Brown AF; Zerzan J; Elmore JG; Wilson IB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Nov; 22(11):1587-95. PubMed ID: 17687616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Declines in funding of NIH R01 research grants.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1387-8. PubMed ID: 16959989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Careers in Science and Grant Administration: View from the National Institutes of Health.
    Zatz M; Dupere S
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2018 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30181194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire.
    Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific approaches to science policy.
    Berg JM
    Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Nov; 24(21):3273-4. PubMed ID: 24174459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Institutes of Health Support for Clinical Emergency Care Research, 2015 to 2018.
    Brown J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2021 Jan; 77(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 32782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size and precision in NIH peer review.
    Kaplan D; Lacetera N; Kaplan C
    PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2761. PubMed ID: 18648494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH.
    Martin MR; Kopstein A; Janice JM
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13526. PubMed ID: 21103331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications.
    Ley TJ; Hamilton BH
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5907):1472-4. PubMed ID: 19056961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Philosophy of science. The coordinates of truth.
    Nabel GJ
    Science; 2009 Oct; 326(5949):53-4. PubMed ID: 19797647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.