These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589061)

  • 21. Research funding. Big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
    Li D; Agha L
    Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6233):434-8. PubMed ID: 25908820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
    Wessely S
    Lancet; 1998 Jul; 352(9124):301-5. PubMed ID: 9690424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peer review of grant applications.
    Swift M
    Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9133):1063-4. PubMed ID: 9759775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review of grant applications.
    Sekikawa A; Aaron DJ; Acosta B; Nishimura R; LaPorte RE
    Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9133):1064. PubMed ID: 9759777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
    Miller G; Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why China needs an NIH.
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):679. PubMed ID: 15085093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review.
    Crotty S; Blish C; Cadwell K; Chi H; Goldrath A; Green D; Kaech SM; Krummel M; Pepper M; Rothlin CV; Wherry EJ;
    Immunity; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 31940266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".
    Dickler HB; Fang D; Heinig SJ; Johnson E; Korn D
    JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(22):2496-501. PubMed ID: 17565084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomedical research funding. A minority viewpoint.
    Price M
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):926. PubMed ID: 21852463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A correlation between National Institutes of Health funding and bibliometrics in neurosurgery.
    Venable GT; Khan NR; Taylor DR; Thompson CJ; Michael LM; Klimo P
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):468-72. PubMed ID: 24239737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rethinking grant peer review.
    Fliesler SJ
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5305):1399. PubMed ID: 9072799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7386):450-1. PubMed ID: 22358805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.
    Fang FC; Bowen A; Casadevall A
    Elife; 2016 Feb; 5():. PubMed ID: 26880623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Science and government. Enhanced: in defense of NCCAM.
    Straus SE; Chesney MA
    Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5785):303-4. PubMed ID: 16857924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NIH consultant finds little evidence of bias against clinical researchers.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(28):A23. PubMed ID: 15835080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. American Idol and NIH Grant Review.
    Pagano M
    Cell; 2006 Aug; 126(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 16923379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.