These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589061)
41. Knowing it and proving it are two different things. Clay PG J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2015; 55(4):464. PubMed ID: 26161492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. NIH peer review: time for some changes. Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. On incentives for innovation. Alberts B Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies. Costello LC Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 20520024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. NIH launches open science Alzheimer initiative. Mullard A Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2019 Nov; 18(12):895. PubMed ID: 31780852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux. Munger K Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'. Kaiser J Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Small business grant proposals. Lader P Science; 1996 Nov; 274(5290):1065. PubMed ID: 8966576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Blue skies for the best people. Williams R Circ Res; 2014 Dec; 115(12):967-8. PubMed ID: 25371544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Berg JM Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Hegde D; Mowery DC Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review. Couzin J Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]