425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589071)
1. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials.
Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18589071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials.
Endo T; Finger WJ
Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Al-Athel MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of strain rate on the behavior of elastomeric impression.
Klooster J; Logan GI; Tjan AH
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 1800722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
Hondrum SO
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials.
Lu H; Nguyen B; Powers JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15295324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
Erkut S; Can G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of investment material type on the contamination zone and mechanical properties of commercially pure titanium castings.
Eliopoulos D; Zinelis S; Papadopoulos T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 16316800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative elasticity tests for elastomeric (non putty) impression materials.
Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 1444955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
