721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589273)
1. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials.
Saghaei M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Nov; 4():26. PubMed ID: 15535880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
Brown DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allocation of patients to conditions in headache clinical trials: randomization, stratification, and treatment matching.
Lipchik GL; Nicholson RA; Penzien DB
Headache; 2005 May; 45(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 15953258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
Weir CJ; Lees KR
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals.
Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Altman DG; Grimes DA; Doré CJ
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1995 Aug; Doc No 197():[81 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8542098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.
Matthews EE; Cook PF; Terada M; Aloia MS
Res Nurs Health; 2010 Jun; 33(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 20499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Randomization for controlled therapeutic trials].
Schemper M
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 94(22):604-9. PubMed ID: 7164464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Introduction of dynamic balancing randomization method and its application].
Liu ZL; Liu BQ; Li LH; Liu JP
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Mar; 9(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21419076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
Berger VW; Weinstein S
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
