241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589366)
1. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients.
Cima RR; Kollengode A; Garnatz J; Storsveen A; Weisbrod C; Deschamps C
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18589366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis and management of retained foreign objects.
Yildirim T; Parlakgumus A; Yildirim S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 May; 25(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 26008665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 1,300 Days and Counting: A Risk Model Approach to Preventing Retained Foreign Objects (RFOs).
Duggan EG; Fernandez J; Saulan MM; Mayers DL; Nikolaj M; Strah TM; Swift LM; Temple L
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2018 May; 44(5):260-269. PubMed ID: 29759259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of retained foreign bodies and near-miss events in the operating room: a ten-year experience at one institution.
Takahashi K; Fukatsu T; Oki S; Iizuka Y; Otsuka Y; Sanui M; Lefor AK
J Anesth; 2023 Feb; 37(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36346477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retained foreign objects after routine cataract surgery: a systematic review.
Kang C; Wang E; Chomsky A; Greenberg PB
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 262(4):1181-1193. PubMed ID: 37962665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multidisciplinary team approach to retained foreign objects.
Cima RR; Kollengode A; Storsveen AS; Weisbrod CA; Deschamps C; Koch MB; Moore D; Pool SR
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2009 Mar; 35(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 19326803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing Retained Foreign Objects in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Keane OA; Chambers C; Brady CM; Rehberg J; Iyer S; Santore MT
J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Dec; 237(6):864-872. PubMed ID: 37638667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are temporal trends in retained foreign object rates after surgery in Switzerland impacted by increasing coding intensity? A retrospective analysis of hospital routine data from 2000 to 2019.
Schwappach D; Havranek MM
BMJ Open; 2023 Aug; 13(8):e075660. PubMed ID: 37562932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative radiography for evaluation of surgical miscounts.
Walter WR; Amis ES; Sprayregen S; Haramati LB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 26044645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retained foreign bodies after surgery.
Lincourt AE; Harrell A; Cristiano J; Sechrist C; Kercher K; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Apr; 138(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 17275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of retained surgical needles from postoperative radiographs.
Sengupta A; Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Cha K; Chronis N; Marentis TC
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):180-191. PubMed ID: 28044343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root causes and preventability of unintentionally retained foreign objects after surgery: a national expert survey from Switzerland.
Schwappach D; Pfeiffer Y
Patient Saf Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(1):15. PubMed ID: 37296424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments.
Hariharan D; Lobo DN
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Mar; 95(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23484986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer aided detection of surgical retained foreign object for prevention.
Hadjiiski L; Marentis TC; Chaudhury AR; Rondon L; Chronis N; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1213-22. PubMed ID: 25735276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retained surgical foreign bodies: a comprehensive review of risks and preventive strategies.
Stawicki SP; Evans DC; Cipolla J; Seamon MJ; Lukaszczyk JJ; Prosciak MP; Torigian DA; Doraiswamy VA; Yazzie NP; Gunter OL; Steinberg SM
Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 19447736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.
Gawande AA; Studdert DM; Orav EJ; Brennan TA; Zinner MJ
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 12529464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
