These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18589513)

  • 1. Flooding impacts on responses of a riparian consumer to cross-ecosystem subsidies.
    Greenwood MJ; McIntosh AR
    Ecology; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1489-96. PubMed ID: 18589513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spiders and subsidies: results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest.
    Marczak LB; Richardson JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):687-94. PubMed ID: 17584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the impact of flooding on trait-displacements and shifts in assemblage structure of predatory arthropods on river banks.
    Lambeets K; Vandegehuchte ML; Maelfait JP; Bonte D
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Nov; 77(6):1162-74. PubMed ID: 18637973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders.
    Benjamin JR; Fausch KD; Baxter CV
    Oecologia; 2011 Oct; 167(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 21688160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses to river inundation pressures control prey selection of riparian beetles.
    O'Callaghan MJ; Hannah DM; Boomer I; Williams M; Sadler JP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61866. PubMed ID: 23613958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest.
    Fukui D; Murakami M; Nakano S; Aoi T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1252-8. PubMed ID: 17032357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing donor ecosystem productivity decreases terrestrial consumer reliance on a stream resource subsidy.
    Davis JM; Rosemond AD; Small GE
    Oecologia; 2011 Nov; 167(3):821-34. PubMed ID: 21647783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do agricultural pesticides in streams influence riparian spiders?
    Graf N; Battes KP; Cimpean M; Dittrich P; Entling MH; Link M; Scharmüller A; Schreiner VC; Szöcs E; Schäfer RB
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():126-135. PubMed ID: 30639710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of the effects of timing of a pulsed resource subsidy on stream ecosystems.
    Sato T; El-Sabaawi RW; Campbell K; Ohta T; Richardson JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Sep; 85(5):1136-46. PubMed ID: 26972564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stream thermal heterogeneity prolongs aquatic-terrestrial subsidy and enhances riparian spider growth.
    Uno H
    Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2547-2553. PubMed ID: 27859130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spider-mediated flux of PCBs from contaminated sediments to terrestrial ecosystems and potential risks to arachnivorous birds.
    Walters DM; Mills MA; Fritz KM; Raikow DF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2849-56. PubMed ID: 20025228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact across ecosystem boundaries - Does Bti application change quality and composition of the diet of riparian spiders?
    Kolbenschlag S; Bollinger E; Gerstle V; Brühl CA; Entling MH; Schulz R; Bundschuh M
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162351. PubMed ID: 36822417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Riparian condition influences spider community structure and the contribution of aquatic carbon subsidies to terrestrial habitats.
    Hunt JL; Paterson H; Close P; Pettit NE
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 746():141109. PubMed ID: 32763604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aquatic predation alters a terrestrial prey subsidy.
    Wesner JS
    Ecology; 2010 May; 91(5):1435-44. PubMed ID: 20503875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trophic overlap between fish and riparian spiders: potential impacts of an invasive fish on terrestrial consumers.
    Jackson MC; Woodford DJ; Bellingan TA; Weyl OL; Potgieter MJ; Rivers-Moore NA; Ellender BR; Fourie HE; Chimimba CT
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(6):1745-52. PubMed ID: 27087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverberating effects of resource exchanges in stream-riparian food webs.
    Collins SF; Baxter CV; Marcarelli AM; Felicetti L; Florin S; Wipfli MS; Servheen G
    Oecologia; 2020 Jan; 192(1):179-189. PubMed ID: 31828529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shifting stream planform state decreases stream productivity yet increases riparian animal production.
    Venarsky MP; Walters DM; Hall RO; Livers B; Wohl E
    Oecologia; 2018 May; 187(1):167-180. PubMed ID: 29511855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The energetic consequences of habitat structure for forest stream salmonids.
    Naman SM; Rosenfeld JS; Kiffney PM; Richardson JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Sep; 87(5):1383-1394. PubMed ID: 29737519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations.
    Paetzold A; Smith M; Warren PH; Maltby L
    Ecology; 2011 Sep; 92(9):1711-6. PubMed ID: 21939066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs.
    Kraus JM; Schmidt TS; Walters DM; Wanty RB; Zuellig RE; Wolf RE
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Mar; 24(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 24689137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.