These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18590368)

  • 1. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.
    Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Tredoux CG; Juncu S
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):463-483. PubMed ID: 37471013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.
    Gronlund SD; Carlson CA; Dailey SB; Goodsell CA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.
    Melara RD; DeWitt-Rickards TS; O'Brien TP
    J Appl Psychol; 1989 Oct; 74(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 2793771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Only your first yes will count": The impact of prelineup instructions on sequential lineup decisions.
    Horry R; Fitzgerald RJ; Mansour JK
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):170-186. PubMed ID: 33119367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regularities in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
    Clark SE; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.