419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18590854)
21. Biomechanical comparison of tibial eminence fracture fixation with high-strength suture, EndoButton, and suture anchor.
Hapa O; Barber FA; Süner G; Özden R; Davul S; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 22284410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Quadriceps Tendon Repair Techniques.
Sherman SL; Copeland ME; Milles JL; Flood DA; Pfeiffer FM
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jun; 32(6):1117-24. PubMed ID: 26895785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bicortical suspensory button fixation yields greater ultimate load to failure over unicortical all-suture anchor fixation in distal biceps brachii tendon repair.
Garvin PM; Wellington IJ; Connors JP; LeVasseur MR; Obopilwe E; Hawthorne BC; Trudeau M; Dorsey C; Mazzocca AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2347-2357. PubMed ID: 35598835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strength of suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel in anatomic reconstruction of the ankle lateral ligaments: a biomechanical study.
Li HY; Hua YH; Wu ZY; Chen B; Chen SY
Arthroscopy; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1817-25. PubMed ID: 24209679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical Properties of a Novel Mesh Suture in a Cadaveric Flexor Tendon Repair Model.
Wallace SJ; Mioton LM; Havey RM; Muriuki MG; Ko JH
J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 44(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 30660397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical comparison of traditional anchors to all-suture anchors in a double-row rotator cuff repair cadaver model.
Goschka AM; Hafer JS; Reynolds KA; Aberle NS; Baldini TH; Hawkins MJ; McCarty EC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Oct; 30(8):808-13. PubMed ID: 26117162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Remplissage Using Interconnected Knotless Anchors: Superior Biomechanical Properties to a Knotted Technique?
Funakoshi T; Hartzler R; Stewien E; Burkhart S
Arthroscopy; 2018 Nov; 34(11):2954-2959. PubMed ID: 30292597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of core suture technique and type on the gliding resistance during cyclic motion following flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study.
Moriya T; Zhao C; Yamashita T; An KN; Amadio PC
J Orthop Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1475-81. PubMed ID: 20872584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Supplementary core sutures increase resistance to gapping for flexor digitorum profundus tendon to bone surface repair - an in vitro biomechanical analysis.
Kusano N; Zaegel MA; Placzek JD; Gelberman RH; Silva MJ
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Jun; 30(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 15862370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair.
Brown SH; Hentzen ER; Kwan A; Ward SR; Fridén J; Lieber RL
J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 20223604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
Latendresse K; Dona E; Scougall PJ; Schreuder FB; Puchert E; Walsh WR
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 15925154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical Study of Asymmetric Flexor Tendon Repair Using 3 Different Suture Materials.
Teo SL; Sarvananthan R; Lim RQR; Wong YR
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2021 Dec; 26(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 34789102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Transosseous Sutures in Tendon-to-Bone Repairs: the Role of the Epitendinous Suture.
Christen SM; Gruenert JG; Harenberg PS
J Invest Surg; 2022 Mar; 35(3):584-590. PubMed ID: 33784920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new modified Tsuge suture for flexor tendon repairs: the biomechanical analysis and clinical application.
Chen J; Wang K; Katirai F; Chen Z
J Orthop Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 9():136. PubMed ID: 25551285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.
Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 17560481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.
Deakin M; Stubbs D; Bruce W; Goldberg J; Gillies RM; Walsh WR
Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1447-51. PubMed ID: 16376233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.
Belyea CM; Abbasi P; Sanghavi KK; Giladi AM; Means KR
J Hand Surg Am; 2023 Dec; 48(12):1276.e1-1276.e7. PubMed ID: 35778231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon-to-bone repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of 3 pullout suture techniques.
Silva MJ; Hollstien SB; Brodt MD; Boyer MI; Tetro AM; Gelberman RH
J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 9523965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Triple-Loaded Suture Anchors Versus a Knotless Rip Stop Construct in a Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Model.
Noyes MP; Lederman E; Adams CR; Denard PJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 May; 34(5):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 29456064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
