These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18591289)

  • 1. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
    Rid A
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19103936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.
    Cookson R; McCabe C; Tsuchiya A
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 18591290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Culyer AJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jul; 1(Pt 3):299-318. PubMed ID: 18634698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NICE accountability for reasonableness: a qualitative study of its appraisal of treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Schlander M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jan; 23(1):207-22. PubMed ID: 17261237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introducing priority setting and resource allocation in home and community care programs.
    Urquhart B; Mitton C; Peacock S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():41-5. PubMed ID: 18325168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority setting in kidney transplantation: a qualitative study evaluating Swedish practices.
    Omar F; Tinghög G; Carlsson P; Omnell-Persson M; Welin S
    Scand J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 41(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 23287398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond accountability for reasonableness.
    Friedman A
    Bioethics; 2008 Feb; 22(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 18251770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The process of updating the National List of Health Services in Israel: is it legitimate? Is it fair?
    Greenberg D; Siebzehner MI; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19619343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
    Pearson S; Littlejohns P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17716419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What reasons do those with practical experience use in deciding on priorities for healthcare resources? A qualitative study.
    Hasman A; McIntosh E; Hope T
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):658-63. PubMed ID: 18757635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?
    Reeleder D; Martin DK; Keresztes C; Singer PA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 15663792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling Healthcare Costs: Just Cost Effectiveness or "Just" Cost Effectiveness?
    Fleck LM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2018 Apr; 27(2):271-283. PubMed ID: 29509125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication of bed allocation decisions in a critical care unit and accountability for reasonableness.
    Cooper AB; Joglekar AS; Gibson J; Swota AH; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Oct; 5():67. PubMed ID: 16259634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: "accountability for reasonableness".
    Lindström H; Waldau S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 18417271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.