580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18591542)
1. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test data: a bivariate Bayesian modeling approach.
Verde PE
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3088-102. PubMed ID: 21170904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.
Menke J
Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(1):54-62, 62-4. PubMed ID: 19936437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis methods for diagnostic accuracy.
Begg CB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1081-2; discussion 1083-4. PubMed ID: 19208369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
Siadaty MS; Shu J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
