176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18591709)
1. Weighting regressions by propensity scores.
Freedman DA; Berk RA
Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):392-409. PubMed ID: 18591709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
Hong G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of non-uniform weighting in non-linear regression for pharmacokinetic neuroreceptor modelling.
Thiele F; Buchert R
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 18094641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heterogeneous treatment effects: what does a regression estimate?
Rhodes W
Eval Rev; 2010 Aug; 34(4):334-61. PubMed ID: 20647500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compound treatments, transportability, and the structural causal model: the power and simplicity of causal graphs.
Petersen ML
Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 21464653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Graphical models for causation, and the identification problem.
Freedman DA
Eval Rev; 2004 Aug; 28(4):267-93. PubMed ID: 15245621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.
Schafer JL; Kang J
Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):279-313. PubMed ID: 19071996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of alternative item weighting strategies on the data gathering component of a clinical skills performance assessment.
Kahraman N; Clauser BE; Margolis MJ
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S72-5. PubMed ID: 18820506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating causal parameters without target populations.
Shahar E
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Oct; 13(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 17824877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.
Austin PC; Lee DS
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 19319923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating the sampling design in weighting adjustments for panel attrition.
Chen Q; Gelman A; Tracy M; Norris FH; Galea S
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3637-47. PubMed ID: 26239405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
Qu Y; Lipkovich I
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.
Greenland S; O'Rourke K
Biostatistics; 2001 Dec; 2(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 12933636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity scores and M-structures.
Sjölander A
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1416-20; author reply 1420-3. PubMed ID: 19340845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy.
Mandel DR; Vartanian O
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis.
Pfeffermann D
Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):239-61. PubMed ID: 8931195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1101-10. PubMed ID: 25687168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
