These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18591709)

  • 21. Case matching and the reduction of selection bias in quasi-experiments: The relative importance of pretest measures of outcome, of unreliable measurement, and of mode of data analysis.
    Cook TD; Steiner PM
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 20230103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sampling weighting strategies in causal mediation analysis.
    Coffman DL; Zhou H; Castellano KE; Schuler MS; McCaffrey DF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):133. PubMed ID: 38879500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Causal inference with a quantitative exposure.
    Zhang Z; Zhou J; Cao W; Zhang J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):315-35. PubMed ID: 22729475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revisiting a statistical shortcoming when fitting the Langmuir model to sorption data.
    Bolster CH
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1986-92. PubMed ID: 18689760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data.
    Furlow CF; Beretvas SN
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):227-54. PubMed ID: 15998179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting.
    Lee BK; Lessler J; Stuart EA
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18174. PubMed ID: 21483818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the effect of change on change: a different viewpoint.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):204-7. PubMed ID: 19239603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A selection-bias free method to estimate the prevalence of hypertension from an administrative primary health care database in the Girona Health Region, Spain.
    Saez M; Barceló MA; Coll de Tuero G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Mar; 93(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 19059668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using a monotone single-index model to stabilize the propensity score in missing data problems and causal inference.
    Qin J; Yu T; Li P; Liu H; Chen B
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1442-1458. PubMed ID: 30566258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.
    Weng HY; Hsueh YH; Messam LL; Hertz-Picciotto I
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 May; 169(10):1182-90. PubMed ID: 19363102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extensions of the penalized spline of propensity prediction method of imputation.
    Zhang G; Little R
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 19053998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic selection bias: a cause of dramatic errors in the inference of treatment effectiveness.
    Dawn AG; Balkrishnan R; Feldman SR
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2008; 19(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 18484425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Specifying the correlation structure in inverse-probability- weighting estimation for repeated measures.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Glymour MM; Weuve J; Robins J
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):644-6. PubMed ID: 22659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 19012268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Mitsuhashi T; Mansournia MA; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):788-793.e1. PubMed ID: 27771142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.