These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18591709)
41. The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory. Oliver A J Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 22(4):659-74. PubMed ID: 12842320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score. Austin PC Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates. Sengewald MA; Pohl S Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):589-610. PubMed ID: 30915587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluating assumptions of weighting class methods for partial response using a selection model. Smith PJ; Marsh LC Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4569-80. PubMed ID: 18613216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects. Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Hill J Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [The necessity of validating regression models--characterization of the most important methods]. Muche R Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Aug; 47(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 18704874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data. Clarke P J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Aug; 62(8):752-8. PubMed ID: 18621963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Austin PC Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Regression models for public health surveillance data: a simulation study. Kim H; Kriebel D Occup Environ Med; 2009 Nov; 66(11):733-9. PubMed ID: 19687020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Weighting formulas for the least-squares analysis of binding phenomena data. Tellinghuisen J; Bolster CH J Phys Chem B; 2009 Apr; 113(17):6151-7. PubMed ID: 19385695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Investigating the effects of the fixed and varying dispersion parameters of Poisson-gamma models on empirical Bayes estimates. Lord D; Park PY Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1441-57. PubMed ID: 18606278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Having one's cake and eating it, too: combining true experiments with regression discontinuity designs. Mandell MB Eval Rev; 2008 Oct; 32(5):415-34. PubMed ID: 18458099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Exploring Selection Bias by Causal Frailty Models: The Magnitude Matters. Stensrud MJ; Valberg M; Røysland K; Aalen OO Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 28244888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact and quantification of the sources of error in DNA pooling designs. Jawaid A; Sham P Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18945289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements. Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]