213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18592929)
1. Hemodynamic performance of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses in critical low stroke volume.
Dzemali O; Bakhtiary F; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 May; 17(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 18592929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 17723814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of valve calcification on systolic and diastolic valvular function--an in vitro model.
Dzemali O; Bakhtiary F; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Dec; 49(6):817-24. PubMed ID: 19043396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type.
Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Pohl A; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):450-5; discussion 455. PubMed ID: 15740954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation.
Graeter TP; Fries R; Aicher D; Reul H; Schmitz C; Schäfers HJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 16784068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High concordance of invasive and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.
Knebel F; Gliech V; Walde T; Eddicks S; Konertz W; Baumann G; Borges AC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 15974527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opening and closure characteristics of different types of stented biological valves.
Kuehnel RU; Pohl A; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 54(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16541347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Simon A; Moritz A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic in vitro calcification of porcine aortic valves.
Bernacca GM; Tobasnick G; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 8000613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Migration forces of transcatheter aortic valves in patients with noncalcific aortic insufficiency.
Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1227-33. PubMed ID: 19748632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 7(5):750-4. PubMed ID: 18628343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
