These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18593099)

  • 1. Responsible Conduct of Research Measure: initial development and pilot study.
    Wester KL; Willse JT; Davis MS
    Account Res; 2008; 15(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 18593099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study.
    Lind RA
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):241-62. PubMed ID: 16634174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishing the reliability and validity of a new instrument: pilot testing.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1993 Apr; 8(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 8501655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
    Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research integrity: collaboration and research needed.
    von Elm E
    Lancet; 2007 Oct; 370(9596):1403-4. PubMed ID: 17950852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An operational measure of physician lifelong learning: its development, components and preliminary psychometric data.
    Hojat M; Nasca TJ; Erdmann JB; Frisby AJ; Veloski JJ; Gonnella JS
    Med Teach; 2003 Jul; 25(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 12893557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a measure to assess pharmacy students' beliefs about monitoring chronic diseases.
    Guirguis LM; Chewning BA
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Dec; 4(4):402-16. PubMed ID: 19064246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further development of an Australian-based measure of social capital in a US sample.
    O'Brien MS; Burdsal CA; Molgaard CA
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 59(6):1207-17. PubMed ID: 15210092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure.
    Mercer SW; Maxwell M; Heaney D; Watt GC
    Fam Pract; 2004 Dec; 21(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 15528286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
    Teitelbaum SL
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits.
    Korn D
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Older adults' drug benefit beliefs: construct definition and measure development.
    Cline RR; Gupta K; Singh RL
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Mar; 4(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18342820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure staff nurses' perception of uncertainty in the hospital environment.
    Salyer J
    J Nurs Meas; 1996; 4(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 8936887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [From misconduct to scientific probity: a turning towards prevention].
    Sylvain H
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2001 Sep; (66):4-15. PubMed ID: 12038284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?
    Luther F
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
    De Broe ME
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.
    Helton-Fauth W; Gaddis B; Scott G; Mumford M; Devenport L; Connelly S; Brown R
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):205-28. PubMed ID: 14989284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of culture in research misconduct.
    Davis MS
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.