These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18593469)
1. Additional evidence that contour attributes are not essential cues for object recognition. Greene E Behav Brain Funct; 2008 Jul; 4():26. PubMed ID: 18593469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recognition of objects displayed with incomplete sets of discrete boundary dots. Greene E Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1043-59. PubMed ID: 17879637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneity in the millisecond range as a requirement for effective shape recognition. Greene E Behav Brain Funct; 2006 Nov; 2():38. PubMed ID: 17134493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The integration window for shape cues is a function of ambient illumination. Greene E Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Mar; 3():15. PubMed ID: 17359541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masking the Integration of Complementary Shape Cues. Geoly A; Greene E Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():178. PubMed ID: 30918480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the contribution of shape attributes to recognition using the minimal transient discrete cue protocol. Greene E; Ogden RT Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Nov; 8():53. PubMed ID: 23146718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Information persistence in the integration of partial cues for object recognition. Greene E Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jul; 69(5):772-84. PubMed ID: 17929699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating persistence of shape information using a matching protocol. Greene E; Hautus MJ AIMS Neurosci; 2018; 5(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 32341953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shape representation by a network of V4-like cells. Murphy TM; Finkel LH Neural Netw; 2007 Oct; 20(8):851-67. PubMed ID: 17884335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cuing paradigm. Gibson BS; Peterson MA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):299-316. PubMed ID: 8189194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial frequency adaptation suggests polar-based coding of local shape cues. Bell J; Dickinson JE; Badcock DR Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2293-301. PubMed ID: 18675841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contour inflections are adaptable features. Bell J; Sampasivam S; McGovern DP; Meso AI; Kingdom FA J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24893785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New encoding concepts for shape recognition are needed. Greene E AIMS Neurosci; 2018; 5(3):162-178. PubMed ID: 32341959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape. Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Levin J; Wasserman EA Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 15795067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of curvature on visual interpolation. Takeichi H Perception; 1995; 24(9):1011-20. PubMed ID: 8552455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local features and global shape information in object classification by deep convolutional neural networks. Baker N; Lu H; Erlikhman G; Kellman PJ Vision Res; 2020 Jul; 172():46-61. PubMed ID: 32413803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]