These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18594301)

  • 1. Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring.
    Koo H; Leveridge M; Thompson C; Zdero R; Bhandari M; Kreder HJ; Stephen D; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 18594301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma.
    Berger-Groch J; Thiesen DM; Grossterlinden LG; Schaewel J; Fensky F; Hartel MJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 May; 139(5):645-650. PubMed ID: 30715568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres.
    Gabbe BJ; Esser M; Bucknill A; Russ MK; Hofstee DJ; Cameron PA; Handley C; de Steiger RN
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1396-401. PubMed ID: 24078539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
    Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of pelvic fractures: analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and Tile classification systems.
    Furey AJ; O'Toole RV; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Copeland CE; Turen C
    Orthopedics; 2009 Jun; 32(6):401. PubMed ID: 19634829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the predictive value of the pelvic ring injury classification systems by Tile and by Young and Burgess.
    Osterhoff G; Scheyerer MJ; Fritz Y; Bouaicha S; Wanner GA; Simmen HP; Werner CM
    Injury; 2014 Apr; 45(4):742-7. PubMed ID: 24360744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgeon variability in the treatment of pelvic ring injuries.
    Furey AJ; O'Toole RV; Nascone JW; Copeland CE; Turen C; Sciadini MF
    Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10):714. PubMed ID: 20954661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of computed tomography in the classification and management of pediatric pelvic fractures.
    Silber JS; Flynn JM; Katz MA; Ganley TJ; Koffler KM; Drummond DS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 11242239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT-generated radiographs in patients with pelvic ring injury: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
    Abdelfattah AA; Moed BR
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26898717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy in radiographic assessment of pelvic ring fracture deformity: analysis of current methods.
    Nystrom LM; McKinley TO; Marsh JL
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Dec; 27(12):708-15. PubMed ID: 23681407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver reliability of a CT-based fracture classification system.
    Humphrey CA; Dirschl DR; Ellis TJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Oct; 19(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 16247306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The role of plain radiography in pelvic trauma in the era of advanced computed tomography].
    Chmelová J; Mrázková D; Dzupa V; Báca V; Grill R; Pleva L
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Dec; 73(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 17266841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Imaging diagnose and clinical meaning for easy neglect occult posterior pelvic ring injury].
    Li M; Xu RM; Zheng Q; Xiao BP; Wang GP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Nov; 21(11):810-3. PubMed ID: 19143238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional versus virtual radiographs of the injured pelvis and acetabulum.
    Bishop JA; Rao AJ; Pouliot MA; Beaulieu C; Bellino M
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 26009268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
    Krappinger D; Kaser V; Kammerlander C; Neuerburg C; Merkel A; Lindtner RA
    Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 30482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic displacement in pelvic ring disruption: reliability of 3 previously described measurement techniques.
    Lefaivre KA; Blachut PA; Starr AJ; Slobogean GP; O'Brien PJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Mar; 28(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 23760181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
    Sinatra PM; Moed BR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Nov; 472(11):3362-9. PubMed ID: 24867453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures.
    O'Toole RV; Cox G; Shanmuganathan K; Castillo RC; Turen CH; Sciadini MF; Nascone JW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 May; 24(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 20418733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
    Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.