These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18594955)

  • 21. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
    Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting children's lies: comparing true accounts about highly stressful injuries with unprepared, prepared, and coached lies.
    Warren KL; Dodd E; Raynor G; Peterson C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 22566366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions.
    Davis M; Markus KA; Walters SB; Vorus N; Connors B
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):683-704. PubMed ID: 16382356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Jundi S; Granhag PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial skin surface temperature changes during a "concealed information" test.
    Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Brown TE; Pavlidis I; Levine JA; Ryan AH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1182-9. PubMed ID: 16786391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.
    Kleinberg B; Mozes M; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):714-723. PubMed ID: 28940300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Police lie detection accuracy: the effect of lie scenario.
    O'Sullivan M; Frank MG; Hurley CM; Tiwana J
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 19242785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Morgan CJ; LeSage JB; Kosslyn SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):554-69. PubMed ID: 18654937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
    Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues.
    Yu X; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yang F; Huang J; Dunbar NE; Jensen ML; Burgoon JK; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2015 Mar; 45(3):506-20. PubMed ID: 24988600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.