159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18594994)
1. Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.
Forsén L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE; Tell GS; Fønnebø V;
Eur J Epidemiol; 2008; 23(9):615-24. PubMed ID: 18594994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of forearm bone mineral density: comparison of precision of five different instruments.
Heilmann P; Wüster C; Prolingheuer C; Götz M; Ziegler R
Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 May; 62(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9541514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of reference point selection on DXA-based measurement of forearm bone mineral density.
Yu W; Ying Q; Guan W; Lin Q; Zhang Z; Chen J; Engelke K; Hsieh E
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):107. PubMed ID: 31707587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.
Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.
Ravn P; Overgaard K; Huang C; Ross PD; Green D; McClung M
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 8883120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.
Hind K; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 20705494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Tromsø study: determinants of precision in bone densitometry.
Rosvold Berntsen GK; Fønnebø V; Tollan A; Søgaard AJ; Joakimsen RM; Magnus JH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11106883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Basic study of bone mineral density in os calcis by single energy X-ray absorptiometry].
Aoyama T; Ito T; Kato T; Suzuki T; Shibata H; Kawabe M; Hara K; Terashi A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 53(10):1188-94. PubMed ID: 8255749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Extended Femur Scans to Support Opportunistic Screening for Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Short Term in-vivo Precision Study.
Smith D; Knapp PK; Wright DC; Hollick DR
J Clin Densitom; 2023; 26(2):101352. PubMed ID: 36740545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.
El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee and heel: methodology and implications for research to reduce bone mineral loss after spinal cord injury.
Peppler WT; Kim WJ; Ethans K; Cowley KC
Spinal Cord; 2017 May; 55(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 27995940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.
Borg J; Møllgaard A; Riis BJ
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 8800788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy.
Rahim A; Holmes SJ; Adams JE; Shalet SM
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1998 Apr; 48(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 9640413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurements in calcaneus with DXA and SXA at other skeletal sites: a population-based study on 280 children aged 11-16 years.
Sundberg M; Gärdsell P; Johnell O; Ornstein E; Sernbo I
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 9850347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in children and adults.
Ilich JZ; Hsieh LC; Tzagournis MA; Wright JK; Saracoglu M; Barden HS; Matkovic V
Bone; 1994; 15(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 8086236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
