154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18595808)
1. Simulation of elevated T-waves of an ECG inside a static magnetic field (MRI).
Gupta A; Weeks AR; Richie SM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1890-6. PubMed ID: 18595808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetically induced electric fields and currents in the circulatory system.
Tenforde TS
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):279-88. PubMed ID: 15556666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimizing interference from magnetic resonance imagers during electrocardiography.
Laudon MK; Webster JG; Frayne R; Grist TM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Feb; 45(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 9473839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal aortic arch hemodynamics and perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Pekkan K; Dur O; Sundareswaran K; Kanter K; Fogel M; Yoganathan A; Undar A
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Dec; 130(6):061012. PubMed ID: 19045541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa].
Weikl A; Moshage W; Hentschel D; Schittenhelm R; Bachmann K
Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic blood flow.
Kinouchi Y; Yamaguchi H; Tenforde TS
Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 8742752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-specific simulations and measurements of the magneto-hemodynamic effect in human primary vessels.
Kyriakou A; Neufeld E; Szczerba D; Kainz W; Luechinger R; Kozerke S; McGregor R; Kuster N
Physiol Meas; 2012 Feb; 33(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 22227810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems.
Chakeres DW; de Vocht F
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15556664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
Glover PM; Bowtell R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner.
Toyomaki A; Yamamoto T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1216-21. PubMed ID: 17969171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electromagnetic flow measurement using a magnetic resonance imaging static field.
Burns SM; Barlow TW; Katzberg RW; Brock JM
Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9419537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the method of characteristics for the study of shock waves in models of blood flow in the aorta.
Shoucri RM; Shoucri MM
Cardiovasc Eng; 2007 Mar; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17342422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of 50 Hz, 0.2 mT magnetic fields on RBC properties and heart functions of albino rats.
Ali FM; S Mohamed W; Mohamed MR
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):535-45. PubMed ID: 14603473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational hemodynamics in the human aorta: a computational fluid dynamics study of three cases with patient-specific geometries and inflow rates.
Karmonik C; Bismuth JX; Davies MG; Lumsden AB
Technol Health Care; 2008; 16(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 19126973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical evaluation of the fields induced by body motion in or near high-field MRI scanners.
Crozier S; Liu F
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):267-78. PubMed ID: 15556665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerated phase-contrast MR imaging: comparison of k-t BLAST with SENSE and Doppler ultrasound for velocity and flow measurements in the aorta.
Stadlbauer A; van der Riet W; Globits S; Crelier G; Salomonowitz E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 19306404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic pulsatile distention in young healthy volunteers is asymmetric: analysis with ECG-gated MRI.
van Prehn J; Vincken KL; Sprinkhuizen SM; Viergever MA; van Keulen JW; van Herwaarden JA; Moll FL; Bartels LW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 37(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19046649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8 T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4 T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability.
Atkinson IC; Renteria L; Burd H; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1222-7. PubMed ID: 17969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
