167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18596405)
21. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Aarts JW; Nieboer TE; Johnson N; Tavender E; Garry R; Mol BW; Kluivers KB
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD003677. PubMed ID: 26264829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.
Locher JA; Chrysostomou M; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; van Herendael BJ; Chrysostomou A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():227-231. PubMed ID: 37390756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Short and long term complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease.
Al-Kadri HM; Al-Turki HA; Saleh AM
Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):806-10. PubMed ID: 12174230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Results of extension of classic indications of vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions.
Ursuleanu A; Nicodin O; Gussi I; Niculescu N; Costăchescu G
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2012; 107(6):761-6. PubMed ID: 23294955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade?
Turner LC; Shepherd JP; Wang L; Bunker CH; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 208(4):277.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23333543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes and Postoperative Complications After Hysterectomies Performed for Benign Compared With Malignant Indications.
Wallace SK; Fazzari MJ; Chen H; Cliby WA; Chalas E
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 27500339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Elective hysterectomy: a clinicopathological review from Abha catchment area of Saudi Arabia.
Sobande AA; Eskandar M; Archibong EI; Damole IO
West Afr J Med; 2005; 24(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 15909707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The incidence of complications by hysterectomy for benign disease in correlation to an assumed preoperative score.
Elessawy M; Schollmeyer T; Mettler L; Jonat W; Schem C; von Hehn U; Alkatout I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 292(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25534160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differences in Postoperative Morbidity among Obese Patients Undergoing Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Tyan P; Amdur R; Berrigan M; Robinson H; Sparks A; Gu A; Wei C; Klebanoff J; Moawad G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 30965116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Large Health Maintenance Organization: Retrospective Application of a Clinical Algorithm.
Buono K; Adams-Piper E; Gokhale K; Li Q; Guaderrama N; Whitcomb EL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):881-890. PubMed ID: 32810604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaginal versus Robotic Hysterectomy for Commonly Cited Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy.
Schmitt JJ; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Gebhart JB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 28689682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: perioperative morbidity.
Doğanay M; Yildiz Y; Tonguc E; Var T; Karayalcin R; Eryılmaz OG; Aksakal O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 20844884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Formal institutional guidelines promotes the vaginal approach to hysterectomy in patients with benign disease and non-prolapsed uterus.
Chrysostomou A; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; Edridge W; van Herendael BJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():133-139. PubMed ID: 33662755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variation in Vaginal Hysterectomy Rates in an Integrated Healthcare System.
Zaritsky E; Tucker LS; Kandahari N; Ojo A; Ritterman Weintraub M; Raine-Bennett TR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 34808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong.
Leung PL; Tsang SW; Yuen PM;
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Jun; 13(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 17548906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safe total intrafascial laparoscopic (TAIL) hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.
Hohl MK; Hauser N
Gynecol Surg; 2010 Sep; 7(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 20700518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomized control trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse in a South African tertiary institution.
Chrysostomou A; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; Edridge W; Kawonga M; van Herendael BJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():73-78. PubMed ID: 34731640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
