299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18597611)
1. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad in root coverage of severe gingival recession defect.
El Haddad SA; Abd El Razzak MY; El Shall M
J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1271-9. PubMed ID: 18597611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of resorbable membrane in treatment of human gingival isolated buccal recession.
Narang S; Gupta R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 22484865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new technique for root coverage using buccal fat pad--a short case report.
Kumari BN; Thiagarajan R; Narayanan V; Devadoss P; Mammen B; Emmadi P
Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(7):547-9. PubMed ID: 20614040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013; 8(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 23390619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full-thickness flap/subepithelial connective tissue grafting with intramarrow penetrations: three case reports of lingual root coverage.
Wilcko MT; Wilcko WM; Murphy KG; Carroll WJ; Ferguson DJ; Miley DD; Bouquot JE
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Dec; 25(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 16353531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2286-92. PubMed ID: 16332241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1506-14. PubMed ID: 11022782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.
Henderson RD; Greenwell H; Drisko C; Regennitter FJ; Lamb JW; Mehlbauer MJ; Goldsmith LJ; Rebitski G
J Periodontol; 2001 May; 72(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 11394391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of multiple areas of gingival recession using a simple harvesting technique for autogenous connective tissue graft.
McLeod DE; Reyes E; Branch-Mays G
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1680-7. PubMed ID: 19792859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pedicled buccal fat pad graft for root coverage in severe gingival recession defect.
Panda S; Del Fabbro M; Satpathy A; Das AC
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 27143839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronally positioned flap for root coverage: poorer outcomes in smokers.
Silva CO; Sallum AW; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16579707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The free rotated papilla autograft: a new bilaminar grafting procedure for the coverage of multiple shallow gingival recessions.
Tinti C; Parma-Benfenati S
J Periodontol; 1996 Oct; 67(10):1016-24. PubMed ID: 8910842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage.
Zucchelli G; Testori T; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 16584355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
