These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18597741)

  • 21. TMS over the intraparietal sulcus induces perceptual fading.
    Kanai R; Muggleton NG; Walsh V
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 100(6):3343-50. PubMed ID: 18922944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contingent capture of involuntary visual spatial attention does not differ between normally hearing children and proficient cochlear implant users.
    Kamke MR; Van Luyn J; Constantinescu G; Harris J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(6):799-811. PubMed ID: 25201816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.
    Dye MW
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2016 Apr; 21(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 26657078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How vision matters for individuals with hearing loss.
    Mitchell TV; Maslin MT
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Sep; 46(9):500-11. PubMed ID: 17828666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduced change blindness suggests enhanced attention to detail in individuals with autism.
    Smith H; Milne E
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 50(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 19309329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does a Flatter General Gradient of Visual Attention Explain Peripheral Advantages and Central Deficits in Deaf Adults?
    Samar VJ; Berger L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():713. PubMed ID: 28559861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: a replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003).
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Ohira H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 18973794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Executive function and language in deaf children.
    Figueras B; Edwards L; Langdon D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(3):362-77. PubMed ID: 18252699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional spread in deaf and hearing participants: face and object distractor processing under perceptual load.
    Hauthal N; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1312-20. PubMed ID: 22638944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are vertical meridian effects due to audio-visual interference? A new confirmation with deaf subjects.
    Belardinelli MO; Santangelo V; Botta F; Federici S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 May; 29(10):797-804. PubMed ID: 17457738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals.
    Bavelier D; Tomann A; Hutton C; Mitchell T; Corina D; Liu G; Neville H
    J Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 20(17):RC93. PubMed ID: 10952732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unvoluntary attentional capture in change blindness.
    Schankin A; Wascher E
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 18665863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of newborn hearing screening: comparing outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Philips B; Corthals P; De Raeve L; D'haenens W; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Swinnen F; De Vel E; Vinck B; Dhooge I
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 19358207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.
    Dye MW; Hauser PC; Bavelier D
    PLoS One; 2009 May; 4(5):e5640. PubMed ID: 19462009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: effects of stimulus compatibility.
    Sladen DP; Tharpe AM; Ashmead DH; Wesley Grantham D; Chun MM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1529-37. PubMed ID: 16478388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of attention networks in deaf children: support for the integrative hypothesis.
    Daza MT; Phillips-Silver J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2661-8. PubMed ID: 23747946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional enhancements and deficits in deaf populations: an integrative review.
    Dye MW; Bavelier D
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 20404407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
    Samar VJ; Parasnis I
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.