BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18599003)

  • 1. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: a dual-task investigation.
    Dent K; Johnston RA; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):282-301. PubMed ID: 18315406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task.
    Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16464284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating word frequency and age of acquisition: The Klein effect revived (and reversed).
    Dewhurst SA; Barry C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):919-24. PubMed ID: 16822157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Johnston RA; Balding R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1304-17. PubMed ID: 20127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age of acquisition affects object recognition: evidence from visual duration thresholds.
    Dent K; Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 17055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis.
    Belke E; Brysbaert M; Meyer AS; Ghyselinck M
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B45-54. PubMed ID: 15925568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The varying effects of age of acquisition.
    Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 18609401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled.
    Pérez MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17162506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age of acquisition and priming on picture naming.
    Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1443-53. PubMed ID: 16846970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: evidence from expert vocabularies.
    Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Bowers JS; Damian MF
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B11-26. PubMed ID: 15110727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis.
    Chen BG; Zhou HX; Dunlap S; Perfetti CA
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):499-516. PubMed ID: 17705943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification.
    Juhasz BJ
    Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 131(5):684-712. PubMed ID: 16187854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 20565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming.
    Bonin P; Fayol M; Chalard M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11394057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting age-of-acquisition effects in Spanish visual word recognition: the role of item imageability.
    Wilson MA; Cuetos F; Davies R; Burani C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1842-59. PubMed ID: 23751009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).
    Bonin P; Chalard M; Méot A; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1172-82. PubMed ID: 17128615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.
    Gale TM; Laws KR; Foley K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16377049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
    De Deyne S; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 16777041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.